Entrance dose measurement: a simple and reliable technique
- PMID: 12804703
- DOI: 10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00236-4
Entrance dose measurement: a simple and reliable technique
Abstract
Verification of tumor dose for patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy is an important part of quality assurance programs in radiation oncology. Among the various methods available, entrance dose in vivo is one reliable method used to verify the tumor dose delivered to a patient. In this work, entrance dose measurements using LiF:Mg;Ti and LiF:Mg;Cu;P thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) without buildup cap was carried out. The TLDs were calibrated at the surface of a water equivalent phantom against the maximum dose, using 6- and 10-MV photon and 9-MeV electron beams. The calibration geometry was such that the TLDs were placed on the surface of the "solid-water" phantom and a calibrated ionization chamber was positioned inside the phantom at calibration depth. The calibrated TLDs were then utilized to measure the entrance dose during the treatment of actual patients. Measurements were also carried out in the same phantom simultaneously to check the stability of the system. The dose measured in the phantom using the TLDs calibrated for entrance dose to 6-and 10-MV photon beams was found to be close to the dose determined by the treatment planning system (TPS) with discrepancies of not more than 4.1% (mean 1.3%). Consequently, the measured entrance dose during dose delivery to the actual patients with a prescribed geometry was found to be compatible with a maximum discrepancy of 5.7% (mean 2.2%) when comparison was made with the dose determined by the TPS. Likewise, the measured entrance dose for electron beams in the phantom and in actual patients using the calibrated TLDs were also found to be close, with maximum discrepancies of 3.2% (mean 2.0%) and 4.8% (mean 2.3%), respectively. Careful implementation of this technique provides vital information with an ability to confidently accept treatment algorithms derived by the TPS or to re-evaluate the parameters when necessary.
Similar articles
-
Feasibility study of entrance in vivo dose measurements with mailed thermoluminescence detectors.Radiother Oncol. 2004 Oct;73(1):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.07.021. Radiother Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15465151
-
Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):1133-40. doi: 10.1118/1.3675401. Med Phys. 2012. PMID: 22320824
-
Absorbed dose measurements of a handheld 50 kVP X-ray source in water with thermoluminescence dosemeters.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;120(1-4):78-82. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci622. Epub 2006 May 30. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 16735571
-
In vivo dose verification from back projection of a transit dose measurement on the central axis of photon beams.Phys Med. 2011 Jan;27(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 7. Phys Med. 2011. PMID: 20615735 Review.
-
In vivo dosimetry during external photon beam radiotherapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999 Jan 15;43(2):245-59. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00341-1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999. PMID: 10030247 Review.
Cited by
-
Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom.J Med Phys. 2018 Oct-Dec;43(4):264-269. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_112_18. J Med Phys. 2018. PMID: 30636852 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous