Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jun;132(2):568-77.
doi: 10.1104/pp.103.021170. Epub 2003 May 1.

Identification of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in Arabidopsis. A proteomic and genomic analysis

Affiliations

Identification of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in Arabidopsis. A proteomic and genomic analysis

Georg H H Borner et al. Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

In a recent bioinformatic analysis, we predicted the presence of multiple families of cell surface glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins (GAPs) in Arabidopsis (G.H.H. Borner, D.J. Sherrier, T.J. Stevens, I.T. Arkin, P. Dupree [2002] Plant Physiol 129: 486-499). A number of publications have since demonstrated the importance of predicted GAPs in diverse physiological processes including root development, cell wall integrity, and adhesion. However, direct experimental evidence for their GPI anchoring is mostly lacking. Here, we present the first, to our knowledge, large-scale proteomic identification of plant GAPs. Triton X-114 phase partitioning and sensitivity to phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C were used to prepare GAP-rich fractions from Arabidopsis callus cells. Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis and one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis demonstrated the existence of a large number of phospholipase C-sensitive Arabidopsis proteins. Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, 30 GAPs were identified, including six beta-1,3 glucanases, five phytocyanins, four fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins, four receptor-like proteins, two Hedgehog-interacting-like proteins, two putative glycerophosphodiesterases, a lipid transfer-like protein, a COBRA-like protein, SKU5, and SKS1. These results validate our previous bioinformatic analysis of the Arabidopsis protein database. Using the confirmed GAPs from the proteomic analysis to train the search algorithm, as well as improved genomic annotation, an updated in silico screen yielded 64 new candidates, raising the total to 248 predicted GAPs in Arabidopsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Identification of Arabidopsis GAPs sensitive to Pi-specific phospholipase C. Integral membrane proteins from callus were prepared by TX-114 phase partitioning and treated with Pi-PLC or buffer only (control). After repartitioning, proteins released into the aqueous phases were labeled with CyDyes. The samples were mixed and then separated by electrophoresis in a single two-dimensional gel. Gels were imaged with a fluorescence scanner. A to D, Broad pH range (3–10). A, Aqueous phase after Pi-PLC treatment. B, Control aqueous phase. C, False-color overlay of Pi-PLC-treated (red) and control (green) fractions. D, LC-MS/MS identifications of GAPs. Numbers correspond to red arrowheads in A. Some spots contained mixtures of related proteins. E to H, Narrow pH range (4–7). E, Aqueous phase after Pi-PLC treatment. F, Control aqueous phase. G, False-color overlay of Pi-PLC-treated (red) and control (green) fractions. H, LC-MS/MS identifications of GAPs. Numbers correspond to red arrowheads in E. Arrowheads in A and E indicate spots specifically enriched in the Pi-PLC-treated fractions. Red, numbered arrowheads correspond to identified GAPs (D and H). White arrowheads with red borders indicate unidentified Pi-PLC-sensitive proteins. Green arrowheads correspond to Pi-PLC-derived proteins.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Identification of Arabidopsis GAPs sensitive to Pi-specific phospholipase C. Integral membrane proteins from callus were prepared by TX-114 phase partitioning and treated with Pi-PLC or buffer only (control). After repartitioning, proteins released into the aqueous phases were labeled with CyDyes. The samples were mixed and then separated by electrophoresis in a single two-dimensional gel. Gels were imaged with a fluorescence scanner. A to D, Broad pH range (3–10). A, Aqueous phase after Pi-PLC treatment. B, Control aqueous phase. C, False-color overlay of Pi-PLC-treated (red) and control (green) fractions. D, LC-MS/MS identifications of GAPs. Numbers correspond to red arrowheads in A. Some spots contained mixtures of related proteins. E to H, Narrow pH range (4–7). E, Aqueous phase after Pi-PLC treatment. F, Control aqueous phase. G, False-color overlay of Pi-PLC-treated (red) and control (green) fractions. H, LC-MS/MS identifications of GAPs. Numbers correspond to red arrowheads in E. Arrowheads in A and E indicate spots specifically enriched in the Pi-PLC-treated fractions. Red, numbered arrowheads correspond to identified GAPs (D and H). White arrowheads with red borders indicate unidentified Pi-PLC-sensitive proteins. Green arrowheads correspond to Pi-PLC-derived proteins.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410 - PubMed
    1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796–815 - PubMed
    1. Bateman A, Bycroft M (2000) The structure of a LysM domain from E. coli membrane-bound lytic murein transglycosylase D (MltD). J Mol Biol 299: 1113–1119 - PubMed
    1. Borner GHH, Sherrier DJ, Stevens TJ, Arkin IT, Dupree P (2002) Prediction of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in Arabidopsis: a genomic analysis. Plant Physiol 129: 486–499 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms