Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jan-Feb;4(1):1-8.
doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000043419.51772.A3.

Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly (PADE): reliability and validity of a new measure

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly (PADE): reliability and validity of a new measure

Michael R Villanueva et al. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To establish the reliability and validity of a measure to assess pain in individuals with advanced dementia.

Design: Sixty-five residents of long-term care facilities were assessed using a new rating tool, the Pain Assessment for the Dementing Elderly (PADE), in two separate studies: (1) Residents were assessed simultaneously by two different raters, at Time 1 and 2, to establish interrater reliability, stability, and internal consistency. (2) Validity was established by assessing the correlation between an agitation scale and the PADE; by comparing groups with pain as a significant clinical factor (as assessed by an independent rater) versus not a significant factor, and by assessing individuals receiving versus not receiving psychoactive medications.

Setting: Four different long-term care facilities, three skilled nursing facilities, and a locked dementia assisted-living facility.

Participants: Twenty-five residents of long-term care facilities with advanced levels of dementia in Study 1, and 40 residents with similar level of dementia in Study 2; 42% of the total sample were rated as having significant painful conditions.

Measurements: For Study 1, the PADE was administered; for Study 2, the PADE and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) were administered.

Results: Reliability coefficients were adequate (interrater = 0.54-0.95; stability = 0.70-0.98; and internal consistency = 0.24-0.88). Validity coefficients were likewise encouraging, with the PADE demonstrating the expected relationship with a measure of agitation. The PADE also differentiated between groups that were independently judged to suffer clinically problematic pain versus those who were not.

Conclusion: The PADE is a reliable and valid tool to assess pain in dementing elderly residents of long-term care facilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types