Evaluation of carpal tunnel release using the Knifelight instrument
- PMID: 12809659
- DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(02)00395-9
Evaluation of carpal tunnel release using the Knifelight instrument
Abstract
We have performed a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the results of open carpal tunnel release with those of carpal tunnel release using a Knifelight (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI). This is a new knife with its own battery-powered light source which enables the operation to be performed through a small incision in the palm of the hand. There were 43 patients in the open operation group and 39 in the Knifelight group. We found no difference in discomfort reported during surgery, in the operative time, in the grip strength measured at 2 and 6 weeks post-operatively or in the proportion of patients cured of their pre-operative symptoms. Patients in the Knifelight group had a statistically significant improvement in the time to return to work and in scar tenderness at 6 weeks post-operatively.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249249.33052.7E. Neurosurgery. 2007. PMID: 17297379
-
A randomized controlled trial of knifelight and open carpal tunnel release.J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Apr;29(2):113-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.09.001. J Hand Surg Br. 2004. PMID: 15010154 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term follow up outcome results of Knifelight carpal tunnel release and conventional open release following a departmental randomized controlled trial. A prospective study.Pol Orthop Traumatol. 2014 May 29;79:67-70. Pol Orthop Traumatol. 2014. PMID: 24940704 Clinical Trial.
-
Open median nerve release using double mini skin incision in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: technique and clinical results.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2003 Sep;43(9):465-7; discussion 468. doi: 10.2176/nmc.43.465. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2003. PMID: 14560854 Review.
-
Results of open carpal tunnel release: a comprehensive, retrospective study of 188 hands.Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 May;67(5):283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb01964.x. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9152160 Review.
Cited by
-
Mini-transverse incision using a novel bush-hook versus conventional open incision for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 19;16(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02608-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34281573 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and Complications in Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release in Private Payer and Medicare Patient Populations.Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):455-461. doi: 10.1177/1558944717751196. Epub 2018 Jan 11. Hand (N Y). 2019. PMID: 29322873 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.Can J Plast Surg. 2005 Winter;13(4):181-7. doi: 10.1177/229255030501300403. Can J Plast Surg. 2005. PMID: 24227928 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intraindividual comparison between open and endoscopic release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Brain Behav. 2016 Feb 16;6(3):e00439. doi: 10.1002/brb3.439. eCollection 2016 Mar. Brain Behav. 2016. PMID: 27099801 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome via a mini-transverse incision and a bush hook versus a mid-palmar small longitudinal incision.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Feb 5;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02967-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 35123521 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical