Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jun;73(6):506-16.
doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(03)00063-8.

Antagonism by methotrexate on mercaptopurine disposition in lymphoblasts during up-front treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Antagonism by methotrexate on mercaptopurine disposition in lymphoblasts during up-front treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Thierry Dervieux et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Methotrexate is postulated to enhance mercaptopurine activation to thioguanine (INN, tioguanine) nucleotides, but the interaction has never been studied in vivo in cancer cells.

Methods: We investigated the effect of methotrexate on mercaptopurine disposition in plasma and leukemic blasts during up-front treatment of 233 children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Children were randomized to receive intravenous mercaptopurine (1 g/m(2) over a 6-hour period) or to receive methotrexate (low dose, 6 oral doses of 30 mg/m(2), or high dose, 1 g/m(2) intravenously), followed by intravenous mercaptopurine. All combinations have been previously used in frontline trials for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Results: Compared with mercaptopurine alone, methotrexate resulted in higher plasma mercaptopurine concentrations (30.3 +/- 14.7 micromol/L versus 23.5 +/- 18.0 micromol/L, P <.001) but, conversely, a 13-fold lower thioguanine nucleotide concentration (0.57 +/- 0.66 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells versus 7.4 +/- 15.2 pmol/5 x 10(6) cells, P <.001) in bone marrow leukemic lymphoblasts. Methotrexate was also associated with higher plasma hypoxanthine concentrations compared with those of patients given mercaptopurine alone (8.7 +/- 13.5 micromol/L versus 3.8 +/- 2.5 micromol/L, P =.029). The percentage change in leukocyte counts measured over a 3-day period showed that mercaptopurine alone had little effect (mean decrease, 20% +/- 33%). In contrast, despite causing lower intracellular thiopurine active metabolite concentrations, methotrexate produced a greater decrease in leukocyte counts (mean, 53% +/- 35%) compared with those in patients receiving mercaptopurine alone (P <.0001).

Conclusion: These pharmacologic findings in the target tissue are consistent with the recently demonstrated lack of clinical benefit of intravenous mercaptopurine in combination with methotrexate. We conclude that, in the setting of newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, methotrexate antagonizes thiopurine metabolite disposition in leukemic blasts after intravenous mercaptopurine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources