A method for controlling for a high placebo response rate in a comparison of venlafaxine XR and diazepam in the short-term treatment of patients with generalised anxiety disorder
- PMID: 12814852
- DOI: 10.1016/s0924-9338(03)00046-4
A method for controlling for a high placebo response rate in a comparison of venlafaxine XR and diazepam in the short-term treatment of patients with generalised anxiety disorder
Abstract
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy of venlafaxine XR (75 or 150 mg/d) with diazepam (15 mg/d) over an 8-week treatment period in 540 non-depressed outpatients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). At week 8, significant improvements from baseline were observed in the venlafaxine XR, diazepam and placebo groups. Although these improvements were higher in the first two groups than in the placebo group for each of the primary efficacy variables (Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total, HAM-A psychic anxiety factor, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) anxiety sub-scale and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) improvement), there were no statistically significant differences between groups. These non-positive results were thought to be due to the very high placebo response observed in some centres. To understand the variability of the study, a secondary preplanned analysis was performed. This involved sub-dividing the study centres according to their ability to detect a two-point mean difference between diazepam and placebo at week 8 on the HAM-A total score. Centres able to show such a difference were termed verum-sensitive. Improvements from baseline to week 8 in venlafaxine XR-treated patients from verum-sensitive centres were significantly greater than in placebo on each of the primary efficacy measures (P </= 0.05). This suggests that those centres able to detect an anxiolytic effect of diazepam were also able to detect an anxiolytic effect of venlafaxine XR. Significant differences in baseline demographics, rates of adverse event reporting and rates of patient discontinuations were noted between patients enrolled at verum-sensitive and verum-insensitive sites. These results reflect the importance of study centre selection in accurately determining efficacy in placebo-controlled trials.
Comment in
-
Statistical considerations about the question of a selection of discriminating centres in the analysis of clinical trial. In response to the paper: "A method for controlling for a high response rate in a comparison of venlafaxine XR and diazepan in the short-term treatment of patients with generalised anxiety disorder".Eur Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;18(4):188-9. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(03)00049-x. Eur Psychiatry. 2003. PMID: 12814853 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Statistical considerations about the question of a selection of discriminating centres in the analysis of clinical trial. In response to the paper: "A method for controlling for a high response rate in a comparison of venlafaxine XR and diazepan in the short-term treatment of patients with generalised anxiety disorder".Eur Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;18(4):188-9. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(03)00049-x. Eur Psychiatry. 2003. PMID: 12814853 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Efficacy of venlafaxine extended-release capsules in nondepressed outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder: A 6-month randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2000 Jun 21;283(23):3082-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.23.3082. JAMA. 2000. PMID: 10865302 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of venlafaxine extended release in patients with major depressive disorder and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder.J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;62(7):523-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n07a04. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001. PMID: 11488362 Clinical Trial.
-
Venlafaxine extended-release: a review of its use in the management of major depression.CNS Drugs. 2001;15(8):643-69. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115080-00007. CNS Drugs. 2001. PMID: 11524036 Review.
-
A non-inferiority comparison of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the treatment of adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder.J Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;22(4):417-25. doi: 10.1177/0269881108091588. J Psychopharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18635722
Cited by
-
The diagnosis and treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Apr;110(17):300-9; quiz 310. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0300. Epub 2013 Apr 26. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013. PMID: 23671484 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise and Anxiety.Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024;67:199-222. doi: 10.1007/7854_2024_498. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39080237 Review.
-
The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety.Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Mar 1;12:541-57. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S91311. eCollection 2016. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016. PMID: 27042068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in generalized anxiety disorder in Chinese patients.Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1661-70. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S38899. Epub 2013 Nov 1. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013. PMID: 24204151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the efficacy of benzodiazepines and serotonergic anti-depressants for adults with generalized anxiety disorder: a meta-analytic review.Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 Jun;19(8):883-894. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1472767. Epub 2018 May 28. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018. PMID: 29806492 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical