PACS for imaging centers
- PMID: 12817420
PACS for imaging centers
Abstract
PACS can be a difficult and confusing decision for any radiology provider, but it can be an even more dynamic question for an outpatient imaging center. Every center represents a unique situation and requires a specialized solution. Typically, most of what is said and discussed about PACS concentrates on solutions and requirements for hospital radiology facilities. Administrators of imaging centers have different problems from hospital administrators, and they need different answers. For imaging centers, the financial justification for PACS may be less immediate than for hospitals. The first thing that must be understood is that no PAC system can make a typical imaging center completely filmless, at least not for quite a while. A hospital has the ability to dictate to its internal referring physicians how a radiological study is delivered, whereas in an imaging center environment, the roles are very much reversed. Once the justification are made for the financial viability of PACS in an imaging center, the next question is how to finance the acquisition of PACS. The decision will depend on how you cost justify your PACS, as well as the shape of your business model, and it will come to a decision between capital purchase or contracting with an application service provider, or ASP. Historically, in the hospital-dominated marketplace, PAC systems have been treated as capital acquisitions. However, for most imaging center, owning the system is more of a problem than a benefit. ASPs increasingly represent a successful alternative for imaging centers. One of the biggest things to consider with PACS is how to store all of those images. There are typically two options, on-site and off-site, with a new "hybrid" option surfacing more recently. Each option has benefits for the user, but the benefits of off-site storage are increasing as the technology advances. Some of the benefits are data security and access. Other issues to address are HIPAA compliance, standardized interfaces such as HL-7, Web access and the choice of view stations.
Similar articles
-
Preparing a business justification for going electronic.Radiol Manage. 2002 Jan-Feb;24(1):14-21. Radiol Manage. 2002. PMID: 11857990
-
Why PACS is no longer a four-letter word.Radiol Manage. 2000 Sep-Oct;22(5):44-8. Radiol Manage. 2000. PMID: 11151321
-
Digital image archiving: challenges and choices.Radiol Manage. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):30-8; quiz 39-41. Radiol Manage. 2002. PMID: 12080930
-
Picture archiving and communication in radiology.Rays. 2003 Jan-Mar;28(1):73-81. Rays. 2003. PMID: 14509181 Review.
-
Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective.Br J Radiol. 1996 Dec;69(828):1089-98. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-828-1089. Br J Radiol. 1996. PMID: 9135462 Review.