Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jul;47(7):2334-8.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.7.2334-2338.2003.

In vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, bacitracin, and four other antimicrobials against intestinal anaerobic bacteria

Affiliations

In vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, bacitracin, and four other antimicrobials against intestinal anaerobic bacteria

D M Citron et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

By using an agar dilution method, the in vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, and five other agents were determined against 300 gram-positive and 54 gram-negative strains of intestinal anaerobes. Ramoplanin was active at <or=2 microg/ml against 287 of 300 (95.7%) gram-positive organisms, including 18 strains of Clostridium difficile for which MICs of ramoplanin were 0.25 to 0.5 microg/ml; for 3 of these, linezolid MICs were 8 to 16 micro g/ml. Nineteen Clostridium innocuum strains for which the vancomycin MIC at which 90% of strains were inhibited was 16 microg/ml were susceptible to ramoplanin at 0.06 to 0.25 microg/ml and to teicoplanin at 0.125 to 1.0 microg/ml. All strains of Eubacterium, Actinomyces, Propionibacterium, and Peptostreptococcus spp. were inhibited by <or=0.25 microg of ramoplanin per ml and <or=1 microg of vancomycin per ml. Ramoplanin was also active at <or=4 microg/ml against 15 of 22 of the Prevotella and Porphyromonas strains tested, but ramoplanin MICs for all 31 strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group, the Fusobacterium mortiferum-Fusobacterium varium group, and Veillonella spp. were >or=256 microg/ml. Ramoplanin displays excellent activity against C. difficile and other gram-positive enteric anaerobes, including vancomycin-resistant strains; however, it has poor activity against most gram-negative anaerobes and thus potentially has a lesser effect on the ecological balance of normal fecal flora.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barry, A. L., M. A. Pfaller, and P. C. Fuchs. 1993. Ramoplanin susceptibility testing criteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1932-1935. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertazzoni Minelli, E., A. Benini, L. Vicentini, and A. Muner. 1995. Antibiotics and their interaction with intestinal contents. Microecol. Ther. 25:360-367.
    1. Biavasco, F., E. Manso, and P. E. Varaldo. 1991. In vitro activities of ramoplanin and four glycopeptides antibiotics against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:195-197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carmeli, Y., G. M. Eliopoulos, and M. H. Samore. 2002. Antecedent treatment with different antibiotic agents as a risk factor for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:802-807. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins, L. A., G. M. Eliopoulos, C. B. Wennersten, M. J. Ferraro, and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 1993. In vitro activity of ramoplanin against vancomycin-resistant gram-positive organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1364-1366. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources