[Changes of periprosthetic bone mineral density in cementless bicontact stem implantation; influence of different parameters--a prospective 4-year follow-up]
- PMID: 12822075
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40171
[Changes of periprosthetic bone mineral density in cementless bicontact stem implantation; influence of different parameters--a prospective 4-year follow-up]
Abstract
Aim: This prospective study describes the periprosthetic BMD (bone mineral density) after implantation of the cementless Bicontact stem over a period of 4 years. Additionally, the influence of several relevant parameters like age, sex, BMI (body mass index) and the influence of the stem-size on the periprosthetic BMD course were investigated.
Method: Measurement of the periprosthetic BMD in 36 patients (15 female, 21 male) in a prospective longitudinal study over 4 years with DEXA (dual energy X Ray absorptiometry) of the proximal Gruen zones 1 and 7.
Results: We found a good precision of the method in vivo with a CV (coefficient of variation) of 1.04 %. There was a decline of the periprosthetic BMD at the whole proximal stem (ROI 0) of 20 % in the first 6 months. Afterwards there was a significant increase at the lateral stem (ROI 1) of 3.46 %, in contrast no significant change could be found medially, maybe as a result of a more lateral induction of power. The investigated parameters BMI, age and sex had no influence on the relative course of mineralisation. At stem sizes bigger than 15 the decline of BMD was significantly larger than at the stem sizes smaller than 15.
Conclusion: DEXA is a sufficiently precise method to investigate periprosthetic BMD. The postoperative periprosthetic course of mineralisation and the extent of BMD loss in the first 6 months after the Bicontact stem is similar to other periprosthetic BMD courses of prosthesis with a similar design. The course of mineralisation in "smaller" stems is obviously more auspicious than the course of "bigger" stems.
Similar articles
-
[Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Nov-Dec;135(6):499-504. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039735. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997. PMID: 9499515 German.
-
Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA.Calcif Tissue Int. 2003 Aug;73(2):115-21. doi: 10.1007/s00223-002-2036-z. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003. PMID: 14565592
-
[Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1998 Mar-Apr;136(2):115-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1051293. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1998. PMID: 9615973 German.
-
The periprosthetic bone remodelling process--signs of vital bone reaction.Int Orthop. 2003;27 Suppl 1:S7-10. Int Orthop. 2003. PMID: 14565677 Review.
-
New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005 Feb;76(315):3-82. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2005. PMID: 15790289 Review.
Cited by
-
[Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].Orthopade. 2005 Apr;34(4):334-44. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0773-1. Orthopade. 2005. PMID: 15726320 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Clinical results of the metha short hip stem: a perspective for younger patients?Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Nov 6;5(4):e34. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e34. eCollection 2013. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013. PMID: 24416478 Free PMC article.
-
The cementless Bicontact stem in a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2211-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1616-4. Epub 2012 Aug 4. Int Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22864457 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical