The quantitative measurement of organizational culture in health care: a review of the available instruments
- PMID: 12822919
- PMCID: PMC1360923
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00154
The quantitative measurement of organizational culture in health care: a review of the available instruments
Abstract
Objective: To review the quantitative instruments available to health service researchers who want to measure culture and cultural change.
Data sources: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Cinahl, Helmis, Psychlit, Dhdata, and the database of the King's Fund in London for articles published up to June 2001, using the phrase "organizational culture." In addition, all citations and the gray literature were reviewed and advice was sought from experts in the field to identify instruments not found on the electronic databases. The search focused on instruments used to quantify culture with a track record, or potential for use, in health care settings.
Data extraction: For each instrument we examined the cultural dimensions addressed, the number of items for each questionnaire, the measurement scale adopted, examples of studies that had used the tool, the scientific properties of the instrument, and its strengths and limitations.
Principal findings: Thirteen instruments were found that satisfied our inclusion criteria, of which nine have a track record in studies involving health care organizations. The instruments varied considerably in terms of their grounding in theory, format, length, scope, and scientific properties.
Conclusions: A range of instruments with differing characteristics are available to researchers interested in organizational culture, all of which have limitations in terms of their scope, ease of use, or scientific properties. The choice of instrument should be determined by how organizational culture is conceptualized by the research team, the purpose of the investigation, intended use of the results, and availability of resources.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627048 Review. French.
-
Instruments for evaluation of safety culture in primary health care: integrative review of the literature.Public Health. 2018 Mar;156:147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Feb 20. Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29453093 Review.
-
Measures of Organizational Culture and Climate in Primary Care: a Systematic Review.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):487-499. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06262-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33140272 Free PMC article.
-
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 27819973
Cited by
-
Can Organisational Culture of Teams Be a Lever for Integrating Care? An Exploratory Study.Int J Integr Care. 2019 Dec 20;19(4):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4681. Int J Integr Care. 2019. PMID: 31871439 Free PMC article.
-
Components of a Measure to Describe Organizational Culture in Academic Pharmacy.Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Dec;81(10):6022. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6022. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017. PMID: 29367768 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of measures of implementation players and processes: Summarizing the dearth of psychometric evidence.Implement Res Pract. 2021 Apr 6;2:26334895211002474. doi: 10.1177/26334895211002474. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Implement Res Pract. 2021. PMID: 37089997 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does a host country capture knowledge of migrant doctors and how might it? A study of UK doctors in New Zealand.Int J Public Health. 2016 Jan;61(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0770-z. Epub 2015 Nov 23. Int J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26598397
-
Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review protocol.BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 1;6(12):e013758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013758. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27909040 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Buckingham M, Coffman C. First Break All the Rules. London: Simon and Schuster; 2000.
-
- Burrell G. “Normal Science, Paradigms, Metaphors, Discourses and Genealogies of Analysis.”. In: Clegg S, Hardy C, Nord W, editors. Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage; 1996. pp. 642–58.
-
- Burrell G, Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Aldershot: Gower; 1979.
-
- Cameron K, Freeman S. “Culture, Congruence, Strength and Type: Relationship to Effectiveness.”. Research in Organizational Change and Development. 1991;5:23–58.
-
- Campbell J. “On the Nature of Organizational Effectiveness.”. In: Goodman P, Pennings J, editors. New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1977. pp. 13–55.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources