Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence
- PMID: 12829562
- PMCID: PMC1126323
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1453
Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence
Abstract
Doctors are being encouraged to improve their critical appraisal skills to make better use of medical research. But when using these skills, it is important to remember that interpretation of data is inevitably subjective and can itself result in bias.
Comment in
-
Statistical interpretation can also bias research evidence.BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):752. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.752-a. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 14512496 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Elstein AS. Human factors in clinical judgment: discussion of Scriven's clinical judgment. In: Engelhardt HT, Spicker SF, Towers B. Clinical judgment: a critical appraisal. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.
-
- Vandenbroucke JP. Medical journals and the shaping of medical knowledge. Lancet 1998;352: 2001-6. - PubMed
-
- Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis 1979;32: 51-63. - PubMed
-
- Koehler JJ. The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of evidence quality. Organ Behav Hum Decision Processess 1993;56: 28-55.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources