Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond
- PMID: 12831464
- PMCID: PMC1693196
- DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1301
Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond
Abstract
Comparisons of the causes and consequences of cross- and self-fertilization have dominated research on plant mating since Darwin's seminal work on plant reproduction. Here, I provide examples of these accomplishments, but also illustrate new approaches that emphasize the role of floral design and display in pollen dispersal and fitness gain through male function. Wide variation in outcrossing rate characterizes animal-pollinated plants. In species with large floral displays, part of the selfing component of mixed mating can arise from geitonogamy and be maladaptive because of strong inbreeding depression and pollen discounting. Floral strategies that separate the benefits of floral display from the mating costs associated with geitonogamy can resolve these conflicts by reducing lost mating opportunities through male function. The results from experiments with marker genes and floral manipulations provide evidence for the function of herkogamy and dichogamy in reducing self-pollination and promoting pollen dispersal. Evidence is also presented indicating that increased selfing resulting from changes to floral design, or geitonogamy in large clones, can act as a stimulus for the evolution of dioecy. The scope of future research on mating strategies needs to be broadened to include investigations of functional links among flowers, inflorescences and plant architecture within the framework of life-history evolution.
Similar articles
-
Variation in floral longevity in the genus Leptosiphon: mating system consequences.Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15(1):220-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00595.x. Epub 2012 May 18. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013. PMID: 22607097
-
The influence of pleiotropy between viability and pollen fates on mating system evolution.Theor Popul Biol. 2015 Feb;99:7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 11. Theor Popul Biol. 2015. PMID: 25448089
-
Pollination ecology and inbreeding depression control individual flowering phenologies and mixed mating.Evolution. 2014 Nov;68(11):3051-65. doi: 10.1111/evo.12507. Epub 2014 Sep 29. Evolution. 2014. PMID: 25130655
-
The best of both worlds? A review of delayed selfing in flowering plants.Am J Bot. 2018 Apr;105(4):641-655. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1045. Epub 2018 Apr 6. Am J Bot. 2018. PMID: 29630718 Review.
-
Sexual interference of the floral kind.Heredity (Edinb). 2002 Feb;88(2):154-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800020. Heredity (Edinb). 2002. PMID: 11932774 Review.
Cited by
-
Herkogamy and its effects on mating patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana.PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057902. Epub 2013 Feb 26. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23469099 Free PMC article.
-
Herkogamy and mating patterns in the self-compatible daffodil Narcissus longispathus.Ann Bot. 2005 Jun;95(7):1105-11. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci129. Epub 2005 Mar 29. Ann Bot. 2005. PMID: 15797899 Free PMC article.
-
Cytoskeleton, Transglutaminase and Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility in the Malinae (Rosaceae).Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jan 8;20(1):209. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010209. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30626063 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Compatible and Incompatible Pollen-Styles Interaction in Pyrus communis L. Show Different Transglutaminase Features, Polyamine Pattern and Metabolomics Profiles.Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jun 7;10:741. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00741. eCollection 2019. Front Plant Sci. 2019. PMID: 31249577 Free PMC article.
-
Linking self-incompatibility, dichogamy, and flowering synchrony in two Euphorbia species: alternative mechanisms for avoiding self-fertilization?PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020668. Epub 2011 Jun 2. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21674062 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources