Complications after reconstruction by plate and soft-tissue free flap in composite mandibular defects and secondary salvage reconstruction with osteocutaneous flap
- PMID: 12832874
- DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000065911.00623.BD
Complications after reconstruction by plate and soft-tissue free flap in composite mandibular defects and secondary salvage reconstruction with osteocutaneous flap
Abstract
Reconstruction of composite defects of the mandible is a challenging problem. Although the use of an osteocutaneous free flap, alone or in combination with another soft-tissue free flap, is generally accepted to be optimal, the bony reconstruction is sometimes undervalued, especially when the cancer is advanced. In such situations, reconstruction is often performed with a reconstruction plate covered with a soft-tissue free flap. Between January of 1997 and July of 2000, 80 patients with composite or extensive composite oromandibular defects underwent treatment with a reconstruction plate and a soft-tissue free flap. All of the patients were male, and the ages of the patients at the time of treatment ranged from 32 to 78 years (mean, 51 years). Tumors were classified as stage IV in 56 patients (70 percent), whereas the remaining 24 patients (30 percent) had recurrent carcinomas. The titanium mandibular reconstruction system manufactured by Stryker (Freiburg, Germany) was used to bridge the mandibular defects. The soft-tissue free flaps used for wound and plate coverage were as follows: anterolateral thigh flap (n = 75), radial forearm flap (n = 3), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (n = 1), and tensor fasciae latae flap (n = 1). Five patients with recurrent carcinomas and 10 with stage IV carcinomas (18.75 percent) died 2 to 6 months after the operation and were excluded from the study. The remaining 65 patients were monitored for an average follow-up period of 22 months (range, 6 to 40 months). During that period, one or more complications occurred for 45 patients (69.2 percent). Plate exposure was the most common complication and was observed for 30 patients (46.15 percent). Twenty of the 65 patients (30.8 percent) required secondary salvage reconstruction with a fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap. The decision to perform a secondary salvage procedure was based on the general health of the patient, the extent of local disease, and the severity of the complications. Patients underwent salvage operations after an average of 11.5 months (range, 6 to 26 months). The major reasons for the second operation were as follows: reconstruction plate exposure (n = 12), soft-tissue deficiency and mandibular contour deformation of the lateral face (n = 7), intraoral contracture and lack of a gingivobuccal sulcus (n = 6), trismus (n = 4), and osteoradionecrosis of the mandible (n = 2). The total flap survival rate was 90 percent (18 of 20 free flaps). In two cases, the skin paddles of the fibula osteoseptocutaneous flaps exhibited partial failure and were revised with pedicled pectoralis major and deltopectoral flaps. The reconstruction plate and free soft-tissue flap procedure for the reconstruction of composite defects of the oromandibular region has many late complications, which eventually necessitate reconstruction of the mandible with an osteocutaneous free flap.
Similar articles
-
Combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jan;109(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200201000-00008. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002. PMID: 11786790
-
Double free flaps in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects in head and neck cancer.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Jan;103(1):39-47. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199901000-00008. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999. PMID: 9915162
-
Reconstruction of extensive composite posterolateral mandibular defects using nonosseous free tissue transfer.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1571-1577. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98b78. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009. PMID: 20009843
-
One-stage reconstruction of composite bone and soft-tissue defects in traumatic lower extremities.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Nov;114(6):1457-66. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138811.88807.65. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15509933 Review.
-
Choice of osseous and osteocutaneous flaps for mandibular reconstruction.Int J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug;10(4):234-42. doi: 10.1007/s10147-005-0504-y. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16136367 Review.
Cited by
-
Reconstruction of mandibular defects.Semin Plast Surg. 2010 May;24(2):188-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255336. Semin Plast Surg. 2010. PMID: 22550439 Free PMC article.
-
3D printed models in mandibular reconstruction with bony free flaps.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018 Feb 2;29(3):23. doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6029-5. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018. PMID: 29396606 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular reconstruction with anterolateral thigh free flap and bridging plate: a retrospective study of 34 oncological cases.Front Surg. 2025 Jun 5;12:1610229. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1610229. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40538821 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular reconstruction in head and neck cancer: which is the gold standard?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;280(9):3953-3965. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08050-5. Epub 2023 Jun 3. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 37269408
-
Safety of resection margins in CAD/CAM-guided primarily reconstructed oral squamous cell carcinoma-a retrospective case series.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Dec;23(4):459-464. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00797-8. Epub 2019 Aug 28. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 31463557
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical