Acute oral pain intensity and pain threshold assessed by intensity matching to pain induced by electrical stimuli
- PMID: 12836504
Acute oral pain intensity and pain threshold assessed by intensity matching to pain induced by electrical stimuli
Abstract
Aims: To investigate a recently developed pain-intensity matching device (Painmatcher) in terms of reproducibility, pain intensity, and unpleasantness experienced by healthy individuals upon pain threshold assessment, as well as differences in pain threshold between genders and between healthy individuals and patients with acute oral pain, and the relation between pain-intensity assessments by the Painmatcher and a visual analog scale (VAS) in the patients.
Methods: Forty healthy individuals and 28 patients with acute oral pain participated. The Painmatcher produces an eventually noxious stimulus by increasing electrical impulses between 2 fingers. Pain thresholds were assessed twice in the healthy individuals and the provoked pain intensity and unpleasantness were recorded on a VAS. In the patients, pain threshold and ongoing pain were assessed with the Painmatcher and the ongoing pain was recorded on a VAS.
Results: Painmatcher scores for the 2 pain threshold assessments were equally correlated in the healthy individuals and patients. VAS scores for ongoing pain and pain caused by the Painmatcher when the ongoing pain intensity was assessed were positively correlated. In the healthy individuals, the degree of unpleasantness was higher than the pain intensity at the pain threshold. The patients had a lower pain threshold than the healthy individuals.
Conclusion: This study indicates that patients with acute oral pain have lower Painmatcher pain thresholds than healthy individuals, suggesting a general decrease in nociceptive thresholds in these patients. The Painmatcher seems to be as valid as a VAS for acute oral pain assessment. The Painmatcher pain threshold is highly reproducible but associated with unpleasantness.
Similar articles
-
Assessing pain perception using the Painmatcher in patients with whiplash-associated disorders.J Rehabil Med. 2008 Mar;40(3):171-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0163. J Rehabil Med. 2008. PMID: 18292917
-
Comparison of pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels between Middle Easterners and Swedes and between genders.J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Apr;36(4):271-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01943.x. Epub 2008 Feb 7. J Oral Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19220713
-
High-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex does not influence the nociceptive flexion reflex but increases the unpleasantness of electrically induced pain.Neurosci Lett. 2007 Mar 19;415(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.12.042. Epub 2006 Dec 30. Neurosci Lett. 2007. PMID: 17258394
-
Why look in the brain for answers to temporomandibular disorder pain?Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180(1):69-75. doi: 10.1159/000086200. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005. PMID: 16088135 Review.
-
Decreased pain sensitivity among people with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of experimental pain induction studies.Pain. 2015 Nov;156(11):2121-2131. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000304. Pain. 2015. PMID: 26207650
Cited by
-
Vasodilatory Peripheral Response and Pain Levels following Radiofrequency Stressor Application in Women with Fibromyalgia.Biomedicines. 2024 Jan 10;12(1):142. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12010142. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 38255247 Free PMC article.
-
Treating stress-related pain with the flotation restricted environmental stimulation technique: are there differences between women and men?Pain Res Manag. 2009 Jul-Aug;14(4):293-8. doi: 10.1155/2009/298935. Pain Res Manag. 2009. PMID: 19714269 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prediction of post-operative pain following arthroscopic subacromial decompression surgery: an observational study.F1000Res. 2013 Feb 4;2:31. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-31.v1. eCollection 2013. F1000Res. 2013. PMID: 24358863 Free PMC article.