A model of determining a fair market value for teaching residents: who profits?
- PMID: 12837866
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.1.40
A model of determining a fair market value for teaching residents: who profits?
Abstract
Context: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Health Resources and Services Administration Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education (GME) Payment Program now supports freestanding children's teaching hospitals.
Objective: To analyze the fair market value impact of GME payment on resident teaching efforts in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Design: Cost-accounting model, developed from a 1-year retrospective, descriptive, single-institution, longitudinal study, applied to physician teachers, residents, and CMS.
Setting: Sixteen-bed PICU in a freestanding, university-affiliated children's teaching hospital.
Participants: Pediatric critical care physicians, second-year residents.
Main outcome measures: Cost of physician opportunity time; CMS investment return; the teaching physicians' investment return; residents' investment return; service balance between CMS and teaching service investment margins; economic balance points; fair market value.
Results: GME payments to our hospital increased 4.8-fold from 577 886 dollars to 2 772 606 dollars during a 1-year period. Critical care physicians' teaching opportunity cost rose from 250 097 dollars to 262 215 dollars to provide 1523 educational hours (6853 relative value units). Residents' net financial value for service provided to the PICU rose from 245 964 dollars to 317 299 dollars. There is an uneven return on investment in resident education for CMS, critical care physicians, and residents. Economic balance points are achievable for the present educational efforts of the CMS, critical care physicians, and residents if the present direct medical education payment increases from 29.38% to 36%.
Conclusions: The current CMS Health Resources and Services Administration Children's Hospitals GME Payment Program produces uneven investment returns for CMS, critical care physicians, and residents. We propose a cost-accounting model, based on perceived production capability measured in relative value units and available GME funds, that would allow a clinical service to balance and obtain a fair market value for the resident education efforts of CMS, physician teachers, and residents.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a pediatric intensive care residency curriculum.Crit Care Med. 1997 Nov;25(11):1898-903. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00031. Crit Care Med. 1997. PMID: 9366776
-
Teaching hospital costs: implications for academic missions in a competitive market.JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):1015-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.1015. JAMA. 1998. PMID: 9749488
-
The impact of graduate medical education financing policies on pediatric residency training.Pediatrics. 1998 Apr;101(4 Pt 2):785-92; discussion 793-4. Pediatrics. 1998. PMID: 9544184
-
Medicare financing of graduate medical education.J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr;17(4):283-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10804.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 11972725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Financing radiology graduate medical education: today's challenges.J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Mar;3(3):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.10.004. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006. PMID: 17412041 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the Value of Work Done by an Orthopedic Resident During Call.J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Sep;6(3):567-70. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00370.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2014. PMID: 26279786 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical