Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia
- PMID: 12838225
- DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.294
Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia
Abstract
Background: Suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy can lead to missed colonic lesions. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.
Methods: Data from the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative national endoscopic database for the period January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2001, were analyzed. Patient demographics, quality of preparation, and colonoscopy findings were abstracted from the database.
Results: Overall, 93,004 colonoscopies with adequate documentation were reviewed. Preparation was adequate for 71,501 (76.9%) of these procedures. On multivariate analysis, preparation adequacy was associated with colonic lesion detection, odds ratio (OR) 1.21: 95% CI [1.16, 1.25]. Adequate preparation demonstrated a closer association with identification of "nonsignificant" lesions (polyps <or=9 mm), OR 1.23: 95% CI [1.19, 1.28], compared with "significant" lesion detection (mass lesion, polyps >9 mm), OR 1.05: 95% CI [0.98, 1.11].
Conclusions: Bowel preparation is inadequate for almost a quarter of patients undergoing colonoscopy. These results suggest that inadequate preparation quality only hinders detection of smaller lesions, while having negligible impact on detection of larger lesions. These results should be confirmed in prospective studies.
Similar articles
-
Socioeconomic and other predictors of colonoscopy preparation quality.Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jul;55(7):2014-20. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1079-7. Epub 2010 Jan 16. Dig Dis Sci. 2010. PMID: 20082217
-
Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22381531
-
Impact of Bowel Preparation Quality on Adenoma Identification During Colonoscopy and Optimal Timing of Surveillance.Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):3092-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3737-2. Epub 2015 Jun 6. Dig Dis Sci. 2015. PMID: 26048021
-
Advances in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;25(2):183-97. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015. PMID: 25839681 Review.
-
Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):903-24. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002. Gastroenterology. 2014. PMID: 25239068 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Age Is the Only Predictor of Poor Bowel Preparation in the Hospitalized Patient.Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:2139264. doi: 10.1155/2016/2139264. Epub 2016 Apr 20. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27446828 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective single-blinded single-center randomized controlled trial of Prep Kit-C and Moviprep: Does underlying inflammatory bowel disease impact tolerability and efficacy?World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 21;27(11):1090-1100. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i11.1090. World J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33776375 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Quality of polyp resection during colonoscopy: are we achieving polyp clearance?Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Jul;57(7):1786-91. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2115-6. Epub 2012 Mar 30. Dig Dis Sci. 2012. PMID: 22461018
-
Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 14;24(26):2833-2843. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30018478 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bowel preparations as quality indicators for colonoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 21;20(11):2746-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2746. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24659866 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical