Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jul;58(1):76-9.
doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.294.

Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia

Affiliations

Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia

Gavin C Harewood et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy can lead to missed colonic lesions. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia.

Methods: Data from the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative national endoscopic database for the period January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2001, were analyzed. Patient demographics, quality of preparation, and colonoscopy findings were abstracted from the database.

Results: Overall, 93,004 colonoscopies with adequate documentation were reviewed. Preparation was adequate for 71,501 (76.9%) of these procedures. On multivariate analysis, preparation adequacy was associated with colonic lesion detection, odds ratio (OR) 1.21: 95% CI [1.16, 1.25]. Adequate preparation demonstrated a closer association with identification of "nonsignificant" lesions (polyps <or=9 mm), OR 1.23: 95% CI [1.19, 1.28], compared with "significant" lesion detection (mass lesion, polyps >9 mm), OR 1.05: 95% CI [0.98, 1.11].

Conclusions: Bowel preparation is inadequate for almost a quarter of patients undergoing colonoscopy. These results suggest that inadequate preparation quality only hinders detection of smaller lesions, while having negligible impact on detection of larger lesions. These results should be confirmed in prospective studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources