Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jul 7;89(1):15-22.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601073.

Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness

R Haward  1 , Z Amir, C Borrill, J Dawson, J Scully, M West, R Sainsbury
Affiliations

Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness

R Haward et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

National guidance and clinical guidelines recommended multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for cancer services in order to bring specialists in relevant disciplines together, ensure clinical decisions are fully informed, and to coordinate care effectively. However, the effectiveness of cancer teams was not previously evaluated systematically. A random sample of 72 breast cancer teams in England was studied (548 members in six core disciplines), stratified by region and caseload. Information about team constitution, processes, effectiveness, clinical performance, and members' mental well-being was gathered using appropriate instruments. Two input variables, team workload (P=0.009) and the proportion of breast care nurses (P=0.003), positively predicted overall clinical performance in multivariate analysis using a two-stage regression model. There were significant correlations between individual team inputs, team composition variables, and clinical performance. Some disciplines consistently perceived their team's effectiveness differently from the mean. Teams with shared leadership of their clinical decision-making were most effective. The mental well-being of team members appeared significantly better than in previous studies of cancer clinicians, the NHS, and the general population. This study established that team composition, working methods, and workloads are related to measures of effectiveness, including the quality of clinical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Input, process, and output model of team effectiveness.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adorian D, Silverberg DS, Tomer D, Wamasher Z (1990) Group discussion with the health care team: a method of improving care of hypertension in general practice. J Hum Hypertens 4(3): 265–268 - PubMed
    1. Berino F, Capocaccia R, Esteve J, Gatta G, Hakulinen T, Micheli A, Sant M, Verdecchia A (eds) (1999) Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe: the EUROCARE-2 Study, Vol. 151. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publ. - PubMed
    1. Berino F, Sant M, Verdecchia A, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Esteve J (eds) (1995) Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe: The EUROCARE Study, Vol. 132. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publ.
    1. Borrill CS, West MA, Shapiro D, Rees A (2000) Team working and effectiveness in health care. Br J Health Care Manage 6(8): 364–371
    1. Bradley M (1996) The role of the practice pharmacist – the new member of the team. VFM Update Primary Focus Issue 2: 26–27

Publication types