Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jun;25(3):112-7.
doi: 10.1023/a:1024053514359.

Medication errors in hospitals: computerized unit dose drug dispensing system versus ward stock distribution system

Affiliations

Medication errors in hospitals: computerized unit dose drug dispensing system versus ward stock distribution system

Jean-Eudes Fontan et al. Pharm World Sci. 2003 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rates and types of drug prescription and administration errors in one pediatric nephrology ward, comparing two dispensing schemes: the first one defined as handwritten prescription plus ward stock distribution system (WSDS), and the second one as computerized prescription plus unit dose drug dispensing system (UDDDS).

Method: Data were collected over an 8-week period, from 1 February to 31 March 1999. Two fifth-year pharmacy students photocopied prescription and administration documents on the ward each day, under the supervision of a senior pharmacist. The medical record analysis was used to compare the prescription with the administration report. Prescribing and administration medication errors were classified according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

Results: Prescribing errors: overall, for both dispensing schemes, a total of 511 prescriptions, resulting in 4532 prescribed drugs (an average of 9 drugs per prescription) were prescribed. The total prescription error rate was 20.7% (937 of 4532), resulting in 1.9 errors per patient per day. The computerized prescription error rate was 10.6% (419 of 3943), the handwritten prescription error rate was 87.9% (518 of 589). This difference was very significant (P < 0.0001). ADMINISTRATION ERRORS: The total opportunity of administration errors was 4589 (sum of administered and omitted drugs). The total administration error rate was 23.5% (1077 of 4589) including wrong administration time, and 11.7% (538 of 4589) excluding administration time. The administration error rate, including administration associated with time errors, was only 22.5% (888 of 3943) for computerized prescription + UDDDS, compared with 29.3% (189 of 646) for handwritten prescriptions plus WSDS (P < 0.001). Excluding administration associated with time errors, the administration error rates were 9.7% and 24.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The drug prescription and administration error rates were significantly decreased using computerized prescription plus UDDDS as compared with handwritten prescription plus WSDS in a pediatric unit (even with potential biases taken into account).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Feb;43(2):368-71 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Mar;49(3):640-8 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Apr;10(4):199-205 - PubMed
    1. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1995 Feb 15;52(4):400-3 - PubMed
    1. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Jan 15;54(2):171-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources