Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review
- PMID: 12842643
- DOI: 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00031-x
Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review
Abstract
The right ventricular apex has been used for cardiac stimulation because this position is easily accessible and is associated with a stable position of the electrode with a low dislodgement rate. This position, however, is associated with a dyssynchronous left ventricular contraction with subsequent deleterious haemodynamic effects. Alternative stimulation sites have been studied extensively because of a potentially better haemodynamic effect compared with right ventricular apex pacing. Using a Cochrane search strategy, nine studies were selected to analyze the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing. The results of these studies (n=217) were pooled and indicated a significantly better haemodynamic effect (odds ratio 0.34, confidence interval 0.15-0.53) compared with right ventricular apex pacing. Therefore, these data suggest that right ventricular outflow-tract pacing may offer a modest but significant benefit over right ventricular apex pacing in patients selected for pacemaker implantation on the basis of symptomatic bradyarrhythmias.
Similar articles
-
Selective site right ventricular pacing.Heart. 2009 Dec;95(24):2030-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.171835. Epub 2009 Sep 8. Heart. 2009. PMID: 19740773 Review.
-
Selective pacing sites.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2015 Apr;63(2):151-60. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2015. PMID: 25711837 Review.
-
Impact of temporary right ventricular pacing from different sites on echocardiographic indices of cardiac function.Europace. 2011 Dec;13(12):1738-46. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur207. Epub 2011 Jul 14. Europace. 2011. PMID: 21764814
-
Hemodynamic benefits of right ventricular outflow tract pacing: comparison with right ventricular apex pacing.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Mar;21(3):536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00095.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998. PMID: 9558684
-
Effect of right ventricular pacing site on QRS width.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2011 Oct;19(5):339-45. doi: 10.1177/0218492311422485. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2011. PMID: 22100929
Cited by
-
Honing in on optimal ventricular pacing sites: an argument for his bundle pacing.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Apr;17(4):372. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0372-3. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015. PMID: 25778424
-
The differences between conventional lead, thin lead, and leadless pacemakers regarding effects on tricuspid regurgitation in the early phase.J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023 Jan;50(1):51-56. doi: 10.1007/s10396-022-01274-8. Epub 2022 Dec 15. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023. PMID: 36520249
-
[His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2008 Mar;19(1):30-40. doi: 10.1007/s00399-008-0598-9. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2008. PMID: 18330673 Review. German.
-
How can we identify the optimal pacing site in the right ventricular septum? A simplified method applicable during the standard implanting procedure.Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Nov 1;3(4):264-72. eCollection 2013. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013. PMID: 24224138 Free PMC article.
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septal Pacing: Mid-term Results and Learning Curve.J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024 Dec 15;15(12):6113-6121. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15123. eCollection 2024 Dec. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024. PMID: 39802075 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous