Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jul 5;327(7405):13-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.13.

Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data

Ben Bridgewater et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: As a result of recent failures in clinical governance the government has made a commitment to bring individual surgeons' mortality data into the public domain. We have analysed a database to compare crude mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery with outcomes that were stratified by risk.

Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Setting: All NHS centres in the geographical north west of England that undertake cardiac surgery in adults.

Participants: All patients undergoing isolated bypass graft surgery for the first time between April 1999 and March 2002.

Main outcome measures: Surgeon specific postoperative mortality and predicted mortality by EuroSCORE.

Results: 8572 patients were operated on by 23 surgeons. Overall mortality was 1.7%. Observed mortality between surgeons ranged from 0% to 3.7%; predicted mortality ranged from 2% to 3.7%. Eighty five per cent (7286) of the patients had a EuroSCORE of 5 or less; 49% of the deaths were in this lower risk group. A large proportion of the variability in predicted mortality between surgeons was due to a small but differing number of high risk patients.

Conclusions: It is possible to collect risk stratified data on all patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. For most the predicted mortality is low. The small proportion of high risk patients is responsible for most of the differences in predicted mortality between surgeons. Crude comparisons of death rates can be misleading and may encourage surgeons to practise risk averse behaviour. We recommend a comparison of death rates that is stratified by risk and based on low risk cases as the national benchmark for assessing consultant specific performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Number of cases and crude mortality by consultant
Fig 2
Fig 2
Number of patients in each EuroSCORE group
Fig 3
Fig 3
Number of deaths in each EuroSCORE group
Fig 4
Fig 4
Percentage mortality in each EuroSCORE group
Fig 5
Fig 5
Observed mortality (with 95% confidence intervals) for each surgeon in the low risk group

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Keogh B, Kinsman R. National adult cardiac surgical database report 2000-2001. London: Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeon of Great Britain and Ireland, 2002.
    1. Dyer O, Heart surgeons are to be rated according to bypass surgery success. BMJ 2003;326: 1053. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired heart disease. Circulation 1979;I3- I12. - PubMed
    1. Tu JV, Jaglal SB, Naylor D. Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Circulation 1995;91: 677-84. - PubMed
    1. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, Guaducheau E, de Vincentiis C, Baudet E, et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery; analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19,030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15: 816-23. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms