Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data
- PMID: 12842949
- PMCID: PMC164230
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.13
Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data
Abstract
Objective: As a result of recent failures in clinical governance the government has made a commitment to bring individual surgeons' mortality data into the public domain. We have analysed a database to compare crude mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery with outcomes that were stratified by risk.
Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
Setting: All NHS centres in the geographical north west of England that undertake cardiac surgery in adults.
Participants: All patients undergoing isolated bypass graft surgery for the first time between April 1999 and March 2002.
Main outcome measures: Surgeon specific postoperative mortality and predicted mortality by EuroSCORE.
Results: 8572 patients were operated on by 23 surgeons. Overall mortality was 1.7%. Observed mortality between surgeons ranged from 0% to 3.7%; predicted mortality ranged from 2% to 3.7%. Eighty five per cent (7286) of the patients had a EuroSCORE of 5 or less; 49% of the deaths were in this lower risk group. A large proportion of the variability in predicted mortality between surgeons was due to a small but differing number of high risk patients.
Conclusions: It is possible to collect risk stratified data on all patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. For most the predicted mortality is low. The small proportion of high risk patients is responsible for most of the differences in predicted mortality between surgeons. Crude comparisons of death rates can be misleading and may encourage surgeons to practise risk averse behaviour. We recommend a comparison of death rates that is stratified by risk and based on low risk cases as the national benchmark for assessing consultant specific performance.
Figures
Comment in
-
Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: higher risk cases need also to be assessed.BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.563-c. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12958126 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: quality of data is important.BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.563-b. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12958128 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Mortality data in adult cardiac surgery for named surgeons: retrospective examination of prospectively collected data on coronary artery surgery and aortic valve replacement.BMJ. 2005 Mar 5;330(7490):506-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7490.506. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15746131 Free PMC article.
-
Improving mortality of coronary surgery over first four years of independent practice: retrospective examination of prospectively collected data from 15 surgeons.BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):421. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38173.577697.55. Epub 2004 Aug 6. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 15298881 Free PMC article.
-
Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25,730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years.Heart. 2007 Jun;93(6):744-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.106393. Epub 2007 Jan 19. Heart. 2007. PMID: 17237128 Free PMC article.
-
Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.043. Epub 2011 Nov 20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012. PMID: 22104669
-
Disclosing clinical performance: the case of cardiac surgery.J Health Organ Manag. 2010;24(6):571-83. doi: 10.1108/14777261011088665. J Health Organ Manag. 2010. PMID: 21155433 Review.
Cited by
-
Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery.BMJ. 2003 Nov 1;327(7422):1032-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1032. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 14593041 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: quality of data is important.BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.563-b. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12958128 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Is There a Surgeons' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention, That Requires Further Investigation? A Systematic Review.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Apr 26;18:467-490. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S357934. eCollection 2022. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022. PMID: 35502434 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Dec;13(12):1959-1970. doi: 10.1007/s11548-018-1860-1. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018. PMID: 30255463 Review.
-
Monitoring surgical and medical outcomes: the Bernoulli cumulative SUM chart. A novel application to assess clinical interventions.Postgrad Med J. 2005 Oct;81(960):647-52. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.030619. Postgrad Med J. 2005. PMID: 16210461 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Keogh B, Kinsman R. National adult cardiac surgical database report 2000-2001. London: Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeon of Great Britain and Ireland, 2002.
-
- Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired heart disease. Circulation 1979;I3- I12. - PubMed
-
- Tu JV, Jaglal SB, Naylor D. Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Circulation 1995;91: 677-84. - PubMed
-
- Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, Guaducheau E, de Vincentiis C, Baudet E, et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery; analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19,030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15: 816-23. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous