Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Jul;17(6):463-5.
doi: 10.1097/00005131-200307000-00014.

Internal fixation versus arthroplasty of comminuted fractures of the distal humerus

William T Obremskey  1 , Mohit Bhandari, Douglas R Dirschl, Emil Shemitsch
Affiliations
Review

Internal fixation versus arthroplasty of comminuted fractures of the distal humerus

William T Obremskey et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Background: A comminuted distal humerus fracture in an older patient is a difficult clinical problem. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) carries the risks of nonunion, loss of fixation, infection, and stiffness. Arthroplasty carries the risks of loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture. Both procedures are technically challenging, and complications following these procedures are frequent.

Objective: To evaluate best available evidence to assist in guiding clinical decision making for ORIF versus arthroplasty of intraarticular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Highest available evidence: 1. Case series of internal fixation or arthroplasty of acute interarticular distal humerus fractures in the elderly (level IV). 2. Review of expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal or controlled research (level V).

Study identification: 1. Computerized data search 1969-2003, Cochrane Database, OVID Search Engine. 2. Reviews of bibliographies of selected articles.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources