Detection of hepatic VX2 tumors in rabbits: comparison of conventional US and phase-inversion harmonic US during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement
- PMID: 12845308
- PMCID: PMC2698070
- DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2003.4.2.124
Detection of hepatic VX2 tumors in rabbits: comparison of conventional US and phase-inversion harmonic US during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement
Abstract
Objective: To compare phase-inversion sonography during the liver-specific phase of contrast enhancement using a microbubble contrast agent with conventional B-mode sonography for the detection of VX2 liver tumors.
Materials and methods: Twenty-three rabbits, 18 of which had VX2 liver tumor implants, received a bolus injection of 0.6 g of Levovist (200 mg/ml). During the liver-specific phase of this agent, they were evaluated using both conventional sonography and contrast-enhanced phase-inversion harmonic imaging (CEPIHI). Following sacrifice of the animals, pathologic analysis was performed and the reference standard thus obtained. The conspicuity, size and number of the tumors before and after contrast administration, as determined by a sonographer, were compared between the two modes and with the pathologic findings.
Results: CE-PIHI demonstrated marked hepatic parenchymal enhancement in all rabbits. For VX2 tumors detected at both conventional US and CE- PIHI, conspicuity was improved by contrast-enhanced PIHI. On examination of gross specimens, 52 VX2 tumors were identified. Conventional US correctly detected 18 of the 52 (34.6%), while PIHI detected 35 (67.3%) (p < 0.05). In particular, conventional US detected only three (8.3%) of the 36 tumors less than 10 mm in diameter, but CE-PIHI detected 19 such tumors (52.8%) (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Compared to conventional sonography, PIHI performed during the liver-specific phase after intravenous injection of Levovist is markedly better at detecting VX2 liver tumors.
Figures


References
-
- Bluemke DA, Paulson EK, Choti MA, DeSena S, Calvien PA. Detection of hepatic lesions in candidates for surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1653–1658. - PubMed
-
- Alderson PO, Adams DF, McNeil BJ, et al. Computed tomography, ultrasound, and scintigraphy of the liver in patients with colon or breast carcinoma: a prospective comparison. Radiology. 1983;149:225–230. - PubMed
-
- Soyer PH, Levesque M, Elias D, Zeitoun G, Roche A. Detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparison of intraoperative ultrasound and CT during arterial portography. Radiology. 1992;183:541–544. - PubMed
-
- Wernecke K, Rummeny E, Bongartz G, et al. Detection of hepatic masses in patients with carcinoma: comparative sensitivities of sonography, CT, and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:731–739. - PubMed
-
- Clarke MP, Kane RA, Steele G, Jr, et al. Prospective comparison of preoperative imaging and intraoperative ultrasonography in the detection of liver tumors. Surgery. 1989;106:849–855. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources