Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy
- PMID: 12845461
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1939-z
Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the value of US and complementary CT in patients with suspected appendicitis, and to detect adverse outcomes of preoperative imaging. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 233 consecutive patients who underwent an appendectomy as an emergency procedure in our hospital, within a 2-year period. Our hospital policy is to perform diagnostic imaging in all patients with clinical suspicion of appendicitis. The US was performed in 227 patients, followed by additional unenhanced helical focused appendiceal CT in 30 patients with equivocal US results. We evaluated the negative appendectomy rate, occurrence of perforation, and our in-hospital delay. Acute appendicitis was pathologically proven in 219 patients, corresponding to a negative appendectomy rate of 6%. The US with optional CT diagnosed appendicitis with a sensitivity of 96.7%. Forty-eight appendices (21.9%) were perforated. The median overall in-hospital delay was 5 h (range 0.5-123.5 h). For the perforated appendices this was 4.5 h (range 0.5-64.5 h), for the non-perforated appendices 6.0 h (range 0.5-123.5 h). In patients with suspected acute appendicitis, US examination with the option of additional CT significantly lowers the negative appendectomy rate as compared with the clinical acumen alone, without adverse effects on the perforation rate or the in-hospital delay.
Similar articles
-
Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):131-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011780. Radiology. 2002. PMID: 12354996
-
Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.Arch Surg. 2001 May;136(5):556-62. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.556. Arch Surg. 2001. PMID: 11343547
-
Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates.Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;93(5):768-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.222_a.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998. PMID: 9625125
-
Can the Diagnosis of Appendicitis Be Made Without a Computed Tomography Scan?Adv Surg. 2017 Sep;51(1):11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 May 17. Adv Surg. 2017. PMID: 28797333 Review. No abstract available.
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Clinical approach to a child with abdominal pain who might have appendicitis.Pediatr Radiol. 2007 Jan;37(1):11-4. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0320-1. Epub 2006 Oct 17. Pediatr Radiol. 2007. PMID: 17043855 Review.
-
Do clinical outcomes suffer during transition to an ultrasound-first paradigm for the evaluation of acute appendicitis in children?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec;201(6):1348-52. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10678. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013. PMID: 24261376 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term Outcome of Open Appendectomy in Southern Iran: A Single Center Experience.Bull Emerg Trauma. 2013 Jul;1(3):123-6. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2013. PMID: 27162839 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality.Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Apr;35(4):392-5. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1372-8. Epub 2005 Jan 6. Pediatr Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15635471
-
Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis.Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):446-54. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1164-x. Epub 2008 Sep 17. Eur Radiol. 2009. PMID: 18797875
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical