Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jul 8;169(1):17-22.

A randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist consultation program for family physicians and their elderly patients

John Sellors  1 , Janusz Kaczorowski, Connie Sellors, Lisa Dolovich, Christel Woodward, Andrew Willan, Ron Goeree, Roxanne Cosby, Kristina Trim, Rolf Sebaldt, Michelle Howard, Linda Hardcastle, Jeff Poston
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist consultation program for family physicians and their elderly patients

John Sellors et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists can improve patient outcomes in institutional and pharmacy settings, but little is known about their effectiveness as consultants to primary care physicians. We examined whether an intervention by a specially trained pharmacist could reduce the number of daily medication units taken by elderly patients, as well as costs and health care use.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in family practices in 24 sites in Ontario. We randomly allocated 48 randomly selected family physicians (69.6% participation rate) to the intervention or the control arm, along with 889 (69.5% participation rate) of their randomly selected community-dwelling, elderly patients who were taking 5 or more medications daily. In the intervention group, pharmacists conducted face-to-face medication reviews with the patients and then gave written recommendations to the physicians to resolve any drug-related problems. Process outcomes included the number of drug-related problems identified among the senior citizens in the intervention arm and the proportion of recommendations implemented by the physicians.

Results: After 5 months, seniors in the intervention and control groups were taking a mean of 12.4 and 12.2 medication units per day respectively (p = 0.50). There were no statistically significant differences in health care use or costs between groups. A mean of 2.5 drug-related problems per senior was identified in the intervention arm. Physicians implemented or attempted to implement 72.3% (790/1093) of the recommendations.

Interpretation: The intervention did not have a significant effect on patient outcomes. However, physicians were receptive to the recommendations to resolve drug-related problems, suggesting that collaboration between physicians and pharmacists is feasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Flow diagram showing the recruitment of family physicians and patients into the randomized controlled trial. R = randomization.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Stewart RB. Polypharmacy in the elderly: a fait accompli? DICP: the annals of pharmacotherapy 1990;24:321-3. - PubMed
    1. Tamblyn RM, McLeod PJ, Abrahamowicz M, Monette J, Gayton DC, Berkson L, et al. Questionable prescribing for elderly patients in Quebec. CMAJ 1994;150:1801-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avorn J. Medication use and the elderly: current status and opportunities. Health Aff 1995;14:276-86. - PubMed
    1. Col N, Fanale JE, Konholm P. The role of medication noncompliance and adverse drug reactions in hospitalizations of the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150:841-5. - PubMed
    1. Bero LA, Lipton HL, Bird JA. Characterization of geriatric drug-related hospital readmissions. Med Care 1991;29:989-1003. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms