Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr;8(2):101-6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1542-474x.2003.08202.x.

Effects of P-wave dispersion on atrial fibrillation in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Effects of P-wave dispersion on atrial fibrillation in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction

Merih Baykan et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2003 Apr.

Abstract

Background: P-wave dispersion (P dispersion), defined as the difference between the maximum and the minimum P-wave duration (P minimum), and maximum P-wave duration (P maximum) have been used to evaluate the discontinuous propagation of sinus impulse and the prolongation of atrial conduction time respectively. The aim of this study was to investigate whether early assessment of P dispersion predicts paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods: We prospectively evaluated 147 consecutive patients (45 women, 102 men; aged 55 +/- 9 years) with a first acute anterior wall MI. All patients were evaluated by echocardiography to measure the left atrial diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Electrocardiography was recorded from all patients on admission and every day during hospitalization.

Results: AF occurred in 25 patients. In 122 patients, AF did not occur. P maximum was found to be significantly higher in patients with AF than in patients without AF (115 +/- 17.3 ms vs 101 +/- 14.7 ms, P = 0.001). P dispersion also was significantly higher in patients with AF than in patients without AF (50 +/- 12.5 ms vs 43 +/- 10.1 ms, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in P minimum (64 +/- 12.5 ms vs 59 +/- 11.7 ms, P = 0.057). The echocardiographically left atrial diameters were not significantly higher in the patients with AF than those without (25 +/- 3.38 mm and 23 +/- 3.36 mm, respectively, P = 0.76). LVEF was found to be significantly different in the patients who developed AF and in those who did not (37.96 +/- 6.18% vs 47.70 +/- 6.01%, P = 0.0001).

Conclusions: Although P maximum and P dispersion are significant predictive factors of AF in patients with acute anterior wall MI in the univariate analysis, on the basis of multivariate analysis, only age and LVEF were independent predictive parameters for AF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The graph depicts the mean duration of P dispersion and P maximum.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldberg RJ, Seeley D, Becker RC, et al Impact of atrial fibrillation on the in‐hospital and long‐term survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A community‐wide perspective. Am Heart J 1990;119: 996–1001. - PubMed
    1. Hod H, Lew AS, Keltai M, et al Early atrial fibrillation during evolving myocardial infarction: A consequence of impaired left atrial perfusion. Circulation 1987;75: 146–150. - PubMed
    1. Pritchett ELC. Management of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1992;326: 1264–1271. - PubMed
    1. Crenshaw BS, Ward SR, Granger CB, et al for the GUSTO‐1 Trial Investigators. Risk factors and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation following acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30: 406–413. - PubMed
    1. Eldar M, Canetti M, Rotstein Z, et al Significance of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Circulation 1998;97: 965–970. - PubMed