Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jul;18(7):576-85.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20350.x.

Academic incentives for faculty participation in community-based participatory research

Affiliations

Academic incentives for faculty participation in community-based participatory research

Philip Nyden. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Recognizing the need to overcome the obstacles of traditional university- and discipline-oriented research approaches, a variety of incentives to promote community-based participatory research (CBPR) are presented. Experiences of existing CBPR researchers are used in outlining how this methodological approach can appeal to faculty: the common ground shared by faculty and community leaders in challenging the status quo; opportunities to have an impact on local, regional, and national policy; and opening doors for new research and funding opportunities. Strategies for promoting CBPR in universities are provided in getting CBPR started, changing institutional practices currently inhibiting CBPR, and institutionalizing CBPR. Among the specific strategies are: development of faculty research networks; team approaches to CBPR; mentoring faculty and students; using existing national CBPR networks; modifying tenure and promotion guidelines; development of appropriate measures of CBPR scholarship; earmarking university resources to support CBPR; using Institutional Review Boards to promote CBPR; making CBPR-oriented faculty appointments; and creating CBPR centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gazzaniga M. Editorial. Science. 1998;282:237.
    1. Edwards R. The academic department: how does it fit into the university reform agenda? Change. 1999;Sept/Oct:17–27.
    1. Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. Renewing the Covenant: Learning, Discovery, and Engagement in a New Ages and Different World. Battle Creek, Mich: Kellogg Commission and National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges; 2000.
    1. O'Meara K, Checkoway B, editors. Johnson Foundation; 1999. Strategies for Renewing the Civic Mission of the American Research University. Proceedings of Wingspread Conference II. Racine, Wis, July 19–21, 1999.
    1. Campus Compact. Available at: http://www.compact.org. Accessed December 15, 2002.

Publication types

MeSH terms