Safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin in patients who are obese and patients with severe renal impairment: analysis from the ESSENCE and TIMI 11B studies
- PMID: 12851605
- DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00121-2
Safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin in patients who are obese and patients with severe renal impairment: analysis from the ESSENCE and TIMI 11B studies
Abstract
Background: The advantages of enoxaparin over unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes are well established. However, no data are available about the safety and efficacy in patients who are obese and patients with severe renal impairment.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of treatment effects was performed on patients who were obese and patients with severe renal impairment from the Efficacy Safety Subcutaenous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B trials, in which patients were treated with enoxaparin or UFH. The primary composite end point was death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization (UR), and the secondary end points were major and any hemorrhage.
Results: When compared with UFH, enoxaparin reduced the rate of the primary end point in patients who were obese (14.3% vs 18.0%, P =.05), patients who were not obese (16.1% vs 19.2%, P <.01), and patients without severe renal impairment (15.7% vs 18.4%, P <.01). There was no significant difference in major bleeding between enoxaparin and UFH in any of the 4 subgroups. There were no differences in either the primary end point (17.6% vs 16.2%, P =.39) or major hemorrhage (1.3% vs 0.8%, P =.12) in patients who were obese receiving either UFH or enoxaparin compared with patients who were not obese. Patients with severe renal impairment tended toward a higher rate of the primary end point (25.9% vs 17%, P =.09) and experienced more major hemorrhages (6.6% vs 1.1%, P <.0001).
Conclusions: Enoxaparin reduced the rate of the combined end point of death/MI/UR in the subgroups of patients who were obese, patients who were not obese, and patients without renal insufficiency. Obesity did not impact clinical outcomes in the combined analysis of ESSENCE and TIMI 11B. Patients with severe renal impairment have a higher risk of clinical events and major and any hemorrhages than patients without severe renal impairment, whether they are treated with UFH or enoxaparin.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial.Am Heart J. 2006 Dec;152(6):1042-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.002. Am Heart J. 2006. PMID: 17161049 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction also treated with clopidogrel.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 12;49(23):2256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.092. Epub 2007 May 25. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17560290 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in diabetic patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25) trial.Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1078-84, 1084.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.027. Am Heart J. 2007. PMID: 18035078 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of the low-molecular weight heparin enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin across the acute coronary syndrome spectrum: a meta-analysis.Eur Heart J. 2007 Sep;28(17):2077-86. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm224. Epub 2007 Jun 28. Eur Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17600038 Review.
-
Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic overview.JAMA. 2004 Jul 7;292(1):89-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.1.89. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15238596 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment dosing of low-molecular-weight heparins and the dose cap dilemma: considerations for patients in Canada.Can J Hosp Pharm. 2009 Sep;62(5):367-74. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v62i5.823. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2009. PMID: 22478918 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring anti-factor xa activity to monitor low-molecular-weight heparin in obesity: a critical review.Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 Jan-Feb;68(1):33-47. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v68i1.1423. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015. PMID: 25762818 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Which antithrombin for whom? Identifying the patient population that benefits most from novel antithrombin agents.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0286-6. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012. PMID: 22661270 Review.
-
Novel fondaparinux protocol for anticoagulation therapy in adults with renal failure and suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a retrospective review of institutional protocol.BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023 Jan 13;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40360-023-00643-4. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023. PMID: 36639796 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing an enoxaparin dosing protocol in morbidly obese patients.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 May;39(4):516-21. doi: 10.1007/s11239-014-1117-y. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015. PMID: 25087072
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical