Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms
- PMID: 12851804
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1509-2
Isolating motion responses in visual evoked potentials by preadapting flicker-sensitive mechanisms
Abstract
Onset of visual motion evokes a component in the EEG, the motion onset VEP. Exploring its motion specificity with a direction-specific adaptation paradigm, previous work demonstrated that less than 50% of the motion onset VEP represents actual motion detection. Here, we tested whether preadaptation of flicker-sensitive mechanisms can help to isolate motion-specific responses in the VEP. Flicker preadaptation was accomplished by limiting dot lifetime in the random-dot kinematograms that we used to study the direction specificity of motion adaptation. With unlimited dot lifetime, motion adaptation reduced the VEP amplitude to 35% (adapted direction) and 50% (opposite direction). With the shortest dot lifetime (40 ms), motion adaptation reduced the amplitude to 55% (adapted direction) and 70% (opposite direction). These findings suggest that random-dot kinematograms with short dot lifetimes could improve the investigation of human motion processing, be it in electrophysiology or other fields. While such stimuli successfully preadapt flicker-related components, they still evoke a sizable response, of which an estimated 70% is motion-specific.
Similar articles
-
Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP.Vision Res. 2001 Aug;41(17):2187-94. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00112-2. Vision Res. 2001. PMID: 11448711
-
Visual motion detection in man is governed by non-retinal mechanisms.Vision Res. 2000;40(18):2379-85. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00106-1. Vision Res. 2000. PMID: 10915879
-
Adaptation characteristics of steady-state motion visual evoked potentials.Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;114(7):1359-66. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00088-9. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12842735
-
Adaptation to real motion reveals direction-selective interactions between real and implied motion processing.J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Aug;19(8):1231-40. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1231. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17650999
-
Absence of direction-specific cross-modal visual-auditory adaptation in motion-onset event-related potentials.Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Jan;43(1):66-77. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13102. Epub 2015 Nov 22. Eur J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26469706
Cited by
-
Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.J Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;102(3):1779-89. doi: 10.1152/jn.00179.2009. Epub 2009 Jul 8. J Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19587320 Free PMC article.
-
A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.Doc Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;114(2):83-105. doi: 10.1007/s10633-006-9043-8. Epub 2007 Feb 16. Doc Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17431818 Review.
-
Motion adaptation: net duration matters, not continuousness.Exp Brain Res. 2006 Mar;169(4):461-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0165-0. Epub 2005 Nov 18. Exp Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16328303
-
Difficulties of motion-onset VEP interpretation in school-age children.Doc Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;128(2):121-9. doi: 10.1007/s10633-014-9429-y. Epub 2014 Feb 23. Doc Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24563372
-
The influence of perceptual training on working memory in older adults.PLoS One. 2010 Jul 14;5(7):e11537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011537. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20644719 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources