Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia
- PMID: 12852712
- DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80118-2
Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia
Abstract
Background: The clinical efficacy and tolerability of linezolid were demonstrated in a previously published, randomized, double-blind, registration study comparing linezolid with vancomycin for the empiric treatment of 396 patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
Objectives: The aims of this study were to obtain additional experience with linezolid and vancomycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia and to satisfy international regulatory requirements.
Methods: Patients with pneumonia acquired after 48 hours in an inpatient facility were randomly assigned to receive either IV linezolid 600 mg or IV vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours for 7 to 21 consecutive days. Patients also received IV aztreonam 1 to 2 g every 8 hours, which could be discontinued if gram-negative pathogens were not identified. The primary efficacy variables were clinical and microbiologic outcomes in evaluable patients at the follow-up visit 15 to 21 days after the end of therapy. Results from the continuation study were analyzed separately and did not include patients from the previously reported study.
Results: A total of 623 patients were enrolled: 321 in the linezolid group and 302 in the vancomycin group. Mean (SD) ages were 63.1 (19.1) years and 61.9 (19.3) years, respectively. Mean (SD) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were 14.1 (5.8) and 14.1 (6.2), respectively. There were no significant differences between the linezolid and vancomycin groups at the follow-up visit in clinical cure rates (114/168 [67.9%] and 111/171 [64.9%]) or microbiologic success rates (47/76 [61.8%] and 42/79 [53.2%]) in evaluable patients (excluding those who had indeterminate or missing outcomes). There were also no significant differences in the rates of all drug-related adverse events (14.0% and 14.0%) or those that occurred in > 1% of patients, including diarrhea (3.7% and 3.0%), nausea (0.3% and 1.3%), and rash (0.6% and 1.7%) in the linezolid and vancomycin groups, respectively.
Conclusion: In the population studied, linezolid appeared to be as well tolerated and as effective as vancomycin, each in combination with aztreonam.
Similar articles
-
Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;32(9):1121-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1867-z. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23568605 Review.
-
Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;32(3):402-12. doi: 10.1086/318486. Epub 2001 Jan 26. Clin Infect Dis. 2001. PMID: 11170948 Clinical Trial.
-
Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia.Chest. 2003 Nov;124(5):1789-97. Chest. 2003. PMID: 14605050
-
Clinical cure and survival in Gram-positive ventilator-associated pneumonia: retrospective analysis of two double-blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin.Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):388-94. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2088-1. Epub 2004 Jan 9. Intensive Care Med. 2004. PMID: 14714107
-
The importance of tissue penetration in achieving successful antimicrobial treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: vancomycin and linezolid.Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Mar;26(3):571-88. doi: 10.1185/03007990903512057. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010. PMID: 20055750 Review.
Cited by
-
Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;32(9):1121-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1867-z. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23568605 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of linezolid compared with other treatments for skin and soft tissue infections: a meta-analysis.Biosci Rep. 2018 Feb 13;38(1):BSR20171125. doi: 10.1042/BSR20171125. Print 2018 Feb 28. Biosci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29229674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Lancet. 2010 May 1;375(9725):1557-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61999-1. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Lancet. 2010. PMID: 20206987 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jul;28(3):603-61. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00134-14. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015. PMID: 26016486 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid and Ertapenem in experimental parapneumonic pleural effusion.J Inflamm (Lond). 2010 May 18;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-22. J Inflamm (Lond). 2010. PMID: 20482752 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical