Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Jul;24(1):154-8; discussion 158.
doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00182-9.

The influence of the rapamycin-derivate SDZ RAD on the healing of airway anastomoses

Affiliations
Free article

The influence of the rapamycin-derivate SDZ RAD on the healing of airway anastomoses

André E Dutly et al. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: Among the many immunosuppressive effects of SDZ RAD (40-0(2-hydroxyethyl)-rapamycin), a rapamycin derivative, is the inhibition of fibroblast proliferation. Since the long-term success of lung transplantation is limited by the development of bronchiolitis obliterans, a fibroblast-associated progressive luminal obstruction of the terminal bronchioli, the use of SDZ RAD as immunosuppressive in pulmonary graft recipients may counteract this process. However, reduction of fibroblast activity, posttransplant, may impair the healing of the bronchial anastomoses.

Materials and methods: The cervical trachea in pigs was denuded, divided and re-anastomosed with Prolene 4-0 single stitches. Control animals (group 1, n=4) were without, and study animals (group 2, n=6) were with SDZ RAD therapy (1.25 mg/kg/day, p.o., 14 days). After 14 days, the pigs were sacrificed. The anastomoses were examined histologically, and breaking strength of tracheal strips of 5-mm width was measured.

Results: All animals survived without complications. Serum levels of SDZ RAD were 30.9+/-8.7 ng/ml (recommended level 20-40 ng/ml). All anastomoses healed macroscopically without difference between the two groups. Breaking strength was significantly lower in the treated animals (group 1 vs. group 2: 11.75+/-0.35 vs. 7.69+/-1.39 N, P=0.01). Histology did not show a significant change in histoarchitecture between the groups.

Conclusions: Although SDZ RAD significantly reduced the breaking strength of the tracheal anastomosis, no obvious histological differences between treated and untreated animals could be detected. Since this model does not reflect the clinical situation, further investigations are necessary to reveal the effect of SDZ RAD on airway wound healing in concert with a contemporary clinically used multidrug immunosuppressive regimen in allograft recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by