Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 12853193
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13800-7
Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Beta blockers reduce mortality in patients who have chronic heart failure, systolic dysfunction, and are on background treatment with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We aimed to compare the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcome.
Methods: In a multicentre, double-blind, and randomised parallel group trial, we assigned 1511 patients with chronic heart failure to treatment with carvedilol (target dose 25 mg twice daily) and 1518 to metoprolol (metoprolol tartrate, target dose 50 mg twice daily). Patients were required to have chronic heart failure (NYHA II-IV), previous admission for a cardiovascular reason, an ejection fraction of less than 0.35, and to have been treated optimally with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors unless not tolerated. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or all-cause admission. Analysis was done by intention to treat.
Findings: The mean study duration was 58 months (SD 6). The mean ejection fraction was 0.26 (0.07) and the mean age 62 years (11). The all-cause mortality was 34% (512 of 1511) for carvedilol and 40% (600 of 1518) for metoprolol (hazard ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.93], p=0.0017). The reduction of all-cause mortality was consistent across predefined subgroups. The composite endpoint of mortality or all-cause admission occurred in 1116 (74%) of 1511 on carvedilol and in 1160 (76%) of 1518 on metoprolol (0.94 [0.86-1.02], p=0.122). Incidence of side-effects and drug withdrawals did not differ by much between the two study groups.
Interpretation: Our results suggest that carvedilol extends survival compared with metoprolol.
Comment in
-
Beta blockers in heart failure.Lancet. 2003 Jul 5;362(9377):2-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13842-1. Lancet. 2003. PMID: 12853188 No abstract available.
-
COMET: a proposed mechanism of action to explain the results and concerns about dose.Lancet. 2003 Sep 27;362(9389):1076; author reply 1077-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14420-0. Lancet. 2003. PMID: 14522541 No abstract available.
-
COMET: a proposed mechanism of action to explain the results and concerns about dose.Lancet. 2003 Sep 27;362(9389):1076-7; author reply 1077-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14421-2. Lancet. 2003. PMID: 14522542 No abstract available.
-
COMET: a proposed mechanism of action to explain the results and concerns about dose.Lancet. 2003 Sep 27;362(9389):1077; author reply 1077-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14422-4. Lancet. 2003. PMID: 14522544 No abstract available.
-
Carvedilol superior to metoprolol for preventing death from CHF.J Fam Pract. 2003 Nov;52(11):830-2. J Fam Pract. 2003. PMID: 14599369 No abstract available.
-
Does the choice of beta-blocker affect outcome in chronic heart failure?CMAJ. 2003 Nov 25;169(11):1188. CMAJ. 2003. PMID: 14638658 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Has COMET solved the controversy as to whether carvedilol is better than metoprolol in heart failure?Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004 Jan;5(1):205-8. doi: 10.1517/14656566.5.1.205. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004. PMID: 14680448
-
Carvedilol was more effective than metoprolol tartrate for lowering mortality in chronic heart failure.ACP J Club. 2004 Jan-Feb;140(1):5. ACP J Club. 2004. PMID: 14711276 No abstract available.
-
The carvedilol or metoprolol European trial.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2004 May;6(3):198-9. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2004. PMID: 15075055 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical