Intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is a valid alternative to high-dose cyclophosphamide for mobilizing peripheral blood CD34+ cells in patients with multiple myeloma
- PMID: 12853690
- DOI: 10.1159/000070967
Intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is a valid alternative to high-dose cyclophosphamide for mobilizing peripheral blood CD34+ cells in patients with multiple myeloma
Abstract
Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are widely used in the setting of dose-intensive chemotherapies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), following chemotherapy or not, is considered the standard growth factor for mobilizing PBSC, the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen still remains to be defined. Cyclophosphamide (CTX) is an effective drug in the treatment of MM which is capable of mobilizing PBSC if followed by growth factors, even though administration of high-dose CTX (7 g/m(2)) results in severe toxicity requiring hospitalization and increasing costs. We have retrospectively analyzed the results obtained in 38 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with 1.2 g/m(2) CTX on days 1 and 3 combined with 40 mg dexamethasone daily for 4 days. The results were compared with those obtained in 25 newly diagnosed MM patients treated with 7 g/m(2) CTX. A higher number of CD34+ cells/kg was collected during the first leukapheresis and a statistically significant lower consumption of G-CSF was observed following two doses of 1.2 g/m(2) CTX compared to the 7 g/m(2) CTX dose. The possibility of treating patients with day-hospital regimens, with a satisfactory yield of hematopoietic cells harvested, may have relevant economic implications for treatment strategies in MM patients.
Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Similar articles
-
A simplified approach to stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients not previously treated with alkylating agents.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 Dec;32(12):1113-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704286. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003. PMID: 14647264 Review.
-
Blood stem cell collection using chemotherapy with or without systematic G-CSF: experience in 52 patients with multiple myeloma.Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Sep;24(5):463-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701910. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999. PMID: 10482928
-
Effect of chemotherapy with alkylating agents on the yield of CD34+ cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Results of the Spanish Myeloma Group (GEM) Study.Haematologica. 2006 May;91(5):621-7. Epub 2006 Apr 19. Haematologica. 2006. PMID: 16627253 Clinical Trial.
-
Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma.Cytotherapy. 2007;9(6):539-47. doi: 10.1080/14653240701452800. Cytotherapy. 2007. PMID: 17882718
-
Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients.Blood. 1995 Jan 15;85(2):588-96. Blood. 1995. PMID: 7529066 Review.
Cited by
-
Chemotherapy-based versus chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization (± plerixafor) in multiple myeloma patients: an Italian cost-effectiveness analysis.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Aug;56(8):1876-1887. doi: 10.1038/s41409-021-01251-8. Epub 2021 Mar 22. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021. PMID: 33753907 Free PMC article.
-
G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;50(6):813-7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.23. Epub 2015 Mar 9. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015. PMID: 25751646
-
Role of PD-1 co-inhibitory pathway in HIV infection and potential therapeutic options.Retrovirology. 2015 Feb 8;12:14. doi: 10.1186/s12977-015-0144-x. Retrovirology. 2015. PMID: 25756928 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical