A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials
- PMID: 12854452
A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials
Abstract
A predominant ethical view holds that physician-investigators should conduct their research with therapeutic intent. And since a physician offering a therapy wouldn't prescribe second-rate treatments, the experimental intervention and the best proven therapy should appear equally effective. "Clinical equipoise" is necessary. But this perspective is flawed. The ethics of research and of therapy are fundamentally different, and clinical equipoise should be abandoned.
Comment in
-
Therapeutic obligation in clinical research.Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 May-Jun;33(3):3. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003. PMID: 12854444 No abstract available.
-
Clinical equipoise and the therapeutic misconception.Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Sep-Oct;33(5):4; author reply 4-5. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003. PMID: 14696270 No abstract available.
-
Clinical equipoise and the therapeutic misconception.Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Sep-Oct;33(5):5-6; author reply 6. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003. PMID: 14696271 No abstract available.
-
Clinical equipoise and the therapeutic misconception.Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Sep-Oct;33(5):6-7; author reply 7. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003. PMID: 14696272 No abstract available.
-
Clinical equipoise: more uncertainty.Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Nov-Dec;33(6):4; author reply 4-5. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003. PMID: 14983547 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
