Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2003 Jul 12;327(7406):73.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7406.73.

Assessment of whether in-hospital mortality for lobectomy is a useful standard for the quality of lung cancer surgery: retrospective study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Assessment of whether in-hospital mortality for lobectomy is a useful standard for the quality of lung cancer surgery: retrospective study

Tom Treasure et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To calculate in-hospital mortality after lobectomy for primary lung cancer in the United Kingdom; to explore the validity of using such data to assess the quality of UK thoracic surgeons; and to investigate the relation between in-hospital mortality and the number of procedures performed by surgeons.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: 36 departments dealing with thoracic surgery in UK hospitals.

Participants: 4028 patients who had undergone lobectomy for primary lung cancer by one of 102 surgeons.

Main outcome measures: In-hospital mortality in relation to individual surgeons, among all patients, and among each of five groups of patients defined by the number of operations performed by the surgeon.

Results: 103 patients (2.6%, 95% confidence interval 2.1% to 3.1%) died after surgery during the same hospital admission. No significant difference was found for in-hospital mortality between the five groups.

Conclusions: The number of procedures performed by a thoracic surgeon is not related to in-hospital mortality. Reporting data on in-hospital mortality after lobectomy for primary lung cancer is a poor tool for measuring a surgeon's performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
In-hospital mortality in relation to number of operations performed by surgeon during 1999-2001
Fig 2
Fig 2
Number of patient deaths in relation to number of operations performed by surgeon during 1999-2001

References

    1. Fine LG, Keogh BE, Cretin S, Orlando M, Gould MM. How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience. BMJ 2003;326: 25-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346: 1128-37. - PubMed
    1. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345: 181-8. - PubMed
    1. English TAH, Bailey AR, Dark JF, Williams WG. The UK Cardiac Surgical Register 1977-1982. BMJ 1984;289: 1205-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gawande A. The learning curve. New Yorker Jan 28, 2002: 52-61.

Publication types

MeSH terms