Strategy for the development of novel anticancer drugs
- PMID: 12856152
- DOI: 10.1007/s00280-003-0596-x
Strategy for the development of novel anticancer drugs
Abstract
Progress in molecular pharmacology has demonstrated each anticancer drug to have a unique molecular target. Recent drug development has focused on compounds that specifically inhibit and/or modify tumor-specific molecular biological changes (target-based drug development). These compounds are generally classified as either small molecules or macromolecules. With the exception of antibodies, the majority of recently developed target-based drugs are small molecules. Assessing the effects of these compounds on their targets would probably help researchers to predict the antitumor effects of these anticancer drugs; however, actually assessing this hypothesis, even in preclinical models, is difficult. Most preclinical experiments attempt to show tumor growth inhibition or shrinkage, leading to a longer survival period or higher cure rate. Few experiments have examined the correlation between antitumor activity and the effect of a compound on its target. In phase I clinical trials of target-based drugs, the determination of maximum tolerated dose is not enough; the effect of the drug on its target should also be evaluated. Recently, dose-escalation strategies based on the effects of drugs on their targets have been proposed, even though an appropriate target effect is necessary but not sufficient to demonstrate clinical efficacy. Compounds that are not specifically directed against molecular targets on or within tumor cells, but against blood vessels, matrix, etc., usually do not cause tumor shrinkage. These compounds include angiogenesis inhibitors and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and are usually used in combination with other treatments at the start of clinical trials. Whether the methodology of clinical trials is sensitive enough to detect the subtle effects of these compounds remains uncertain. The effects of experimental drugs on their targets are rarely examined in clinical trials. Few data from translational studies are available and data obtained using surrogate tissues do not necessarily reflect the effects of the drugs on in situ tumors. Parameters such as time to progression, changes in tumor markers, and growth rates often vary significantly and are regarded as soft endpoints. Phase III trials evaluating survival benefit require extensive resources, including a large number of patients, a sophisticated data center, and well-trained study groups. The problems and future prospects of novel anticancer drug development are discussed.
Similar articles
-
[Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].Kekkaku. 2006 Dec;81(12):753-74. Kekkaku. 2006. PMID: 17240921 Review. Japanese.
-
The opportunities and challenges of personalized genome-based molecular therapies for cancer: targets, technologies, and molecular chaperones.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;52 Suppl 1:S45-56. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0593-0. Epub 2003 Jun 18. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003. PMID: 12819933 Review.
-
Alternative strategies in drug development: clinical pharmacological aspects.Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Dec;37(12):575-83. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999. PMID: 10599949 Review.
-
Targeted cancer therapy: conferring specificity to cytotoxic drugs.Acc Chem Res. 2008 Jan;41(1):98-107. doi: 10.1021/ar700108g. Epub 2007 Aug 18. Acc Chem Res. 2008. PMID: 17705444 Review.
-
Of mice and men: values and liabilities of the athymic nude mouse model in anticancer drug development.Eur J Cancer. 2004 Apr;40(6):827-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.028. Eur J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15120038 Review.
Cited by
-
Translatability scoring in drug development: eight case studies.J Transl Med. 2012 Mar 7;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-39. J Transl Med. 2012. PMID: 22397594 Free PMC article.
-
Design of a recombinant immunotoxin against the human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor.Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Feb;46(1):1093-1097. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4567-z. Epub 2018 Dec 18. Mol Biol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30565075
-
What are the reasons for negative phase III trials of molecular-target-based drugs?Cancer Sci. 2004 Oct;95(10):772-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02180.x. Cancer Sci. 2004. PMID: 15504242 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Self-assembling peptide-based nanoparticles enhance anticancer effect of ellipticine in vitro and in vivo.Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:3221-33. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S31858. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012. PMID: 22802684 Free PMC article.
-
An overview of pyridazin-3(2H)-one: a core for developing bioactive agents targeting cardiovascular diseases and cancer.Future Med Chem. 2024 Aug 17;16(16):1685-1703. doi: 10.1080/17568919.2024.2379234. Epub 2024 Aug 6. Future Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 39105606 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources