The impact of variable stoichiometry on predator-prey interactions: a multinutrient approach
- PMID: 12856235
- DOI: 10.1086/376577
The impact of variable stoichiometry on predator-prey interactions: a multinutrient approach
Abstract
A model for prey and predators is formulated in which three essential nutrients can limit growth of both populations. Prey take up dissolved nutrients, while predators ingest prey, assimilate a fraction of ingested nutrients that depends on their current nutrient status, and recycle the balance. Although individuals are modeled as identical within populations, amounts of nutrients within individuals vary over time in both populations, with reproductive rates increasing with these amounts. Equilibria and their stability depend on nutrient supply conditions. When nutrient supply increases, unusual results can occur, such as a decrease of prey density. This phenomenon occurs if, with increasing nutrient, predators sequester rather than recycle nutrients. Furthermore, despite use of a linear functional response for predators, high nutrient supply can destabilize equilibria. Responses to nutrient supply depend on the balance between assimilation and recycling of nutrients by predators, which differs depending on the identity of the limiting nutrient. Applied to microbial ecosystems, the model predicts that the efficiency of organic carbon mineralization is reduced when supply of mineral nutrients is low and when equilibria are unstable. The extent to which predators recycle or sequester limiting nutrients for their prey is of critical importance for the stability of predator-prey systems and their response to enrichment.
Similar articles
-
Predation, competition, and nutrient recycling: a stoichiometric approach with multiple nutrients.J Theor Biol. 2004 Jul 7;229(1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.001. J Theor Biol. 2004. PMID: 15178183
-
Stoichiometry, herbivory and competition for nutrients: simple models based on planktonic ecosystems.J Theor Biol. 2002 Feb 21;214(4):599-618. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2488. J Theor Biol. 2002. PMID: 11851370
-
Impacts of foraging facilitation among predators on predator-prey dynamics.Bull Math Biol. 2010 Jan;72(1):94-121. doi: 10.1007/s11538-009-9439-1. Epub 2009 Aug 21. Bull Math Biol. 2010. PMID: 19697089
-
Effects of prey refuges on a predator-prey model with a class of functional responses: the role of refuges.Math Biosci. 2009 Apr;218(2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Math Biosci. 2009. PMID: 19167411 Review.
-
Do wild carnivores forage for prey or for nutrients? Evidence for nutrient-specific foraging in vertebrate predators.Bioessays. 2015 Jun;37(6):701-9. doi: 10.1002/bies.201400171. Epub 2015 Mar 12. Bioessays. 2015. PMID: 25767065 Review.
Cited by
-
Herbivore consumers face different challenges along opposite sides of the stoichiometric knife-edge.Ecol Lett. 2019 Dec;22(12):2018-2027. doi: 10.1111/ele.13386. Epub 2019 Sep 11. Ecol Lett. 2019. PMID: 31512359 Free PMC article.
-
Colimitation of a freshwater herbivore by sterols and polyunsaturated fatty acids.Proc Biol Sci. 2009 May 22;276(1663):1805-14. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1540. Epub 2009 Feb 20. Proc Biol Sci. 2009. PMID: 19324803 Free PMC article.
-
Ecological stoichiometry of indirect grazer effects on periphyton nutrient content.Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):619-30. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0930-9. Epub 2007 Dec 5. Oecologia. 2008. PMID: 18064492
-
Dynamics and nutritional ecology of a nanoflagellate preying upon bacteria.Microb Ecol. 2009 Aug;58(2):231-43. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9486-z. Epub 2009 Jan 30. Microb Ecol. 2009. PMID: 19184185
-
Prey food quality affects flagellate ingestion rates.Microb Ecol. 2007 Jan;53(1):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9140-y. Epub 2006 Dec 22. Microb Ecol. 2007. PMID: 17186152
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical