Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Apr-Jun;5(2):e9.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e9.

Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: a qualitative exploration

Madhavi R Patt  1 , Thomas K Houston, Mollie W Jenckes, Daniel Z Sands, Daniel E Ford
Affiliations

Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: a qualitative exploration

Madhavi R Patt et al. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Despite the potential for rapid, asynchronous, documentable communication, the use of e-mail for physician-patient communication has not been widely adopted.

Objective: To survey physicians currently using e-mail with their patients daily to understand their experiences.

Methods: In-depth phone interviews of 45 physicians currently using e-mail with patients were audio taped and transcribed verbatim. Two investigators independently qualitatively coded comments. Differences were adjudicated by group consensus.

Results: Almost all of the 642 comments from these physicians who currently use e-mail with patients daily could be grouped into 1 of 4 broad domains: (1) e-mail access and content, (2) effects of e-mail on the doctor-patient relationship, (3) managing clinical issues by e-mail, and (4) integrating e-mail into office processes. The most consistent theme was that e-mail communication enhances chronic-disease management. Many physicians also reported improved continuity of care and increased flexibility in responding to nonurgent issues. Integration of e-mail into daily workflow, such as utilization of office personnel, appears to be a significant area of concern for many of the physicians. For other issues, such as content, efficiency of e-mail, and confidentiality, there were diverging experiences and opinions. Physicians appear to be selective in choosing which patients they will communicate with via e-mail, but the criteria for selection is unclear.

Conclusion: These physician respondents did perceive benefits to e-mail with a select group of patients. Several areas, such as identifying clinical situations where e-mail communication is effective, incorporating e-mail into office flow, and being reimbursed for online medical care/communication, need to be addressed before this mode of communication diffuses into most practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz M A. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4(1):23–30. - PubMed
    1. Kaplan S H, Greenfield S, Ware J E. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S110–27. - PubMed
    1. US Dept of Health and Human Services, authors. Healthy People 2010 (2 Volume Set) Washington, DC: International Medical Publishing; 2000. Oct 30,
    1. Institute of Medicine, authors. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. Jun 1, http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072808/html/ - PubMed
    1. Fridsma D B, Ford P, Altman R. A survey of patient access to electronic mail: attitudes, barriers, and opportunities. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:15–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types