Care of preterm infants: programs of research and their relationship to developmental science
- PMID: 12858692
Care of preterm infants: programs of research and their relationship to developmental science
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to examine the topics covered in current programs of nursing research on the care of the preterm infant and to determine the extent to which this research is informed by developmental science. A researcher was considered to have a current program of research if he or she had at least five publications published since 1990 and was the first author on at least three of them. The infants in a study could be any age from birth throughout childhood; studies focusing on parenting, nursing, or other populations of infants were not included. Seventeen nurse researchers had current programs of research in this area. These programs had four themes. Those of Becker, Evans, Pridham, Shiao, and Zahr focused on infant responses to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment and treatments. Franck, Johnston, and Stevens focused on pain management. Harrison, Ludington-Hoe, and White-Traut's research focused on infant stimulation. Holditch-Davis, McCain, McGrath, Medoff-Cooper, Schraeder, and Youngblut studied infant behavior and development. These research programs had many strengths, including strong interdisciplinary focus and clinical relevance. However, additional emphasis is needed on the care of the critically ill infant. Also, despite the fact that the preterm infant's neurological system develops rapidly over the first year, only three of these researchers used a developmental science perspective. Only research on infant behavior and development focused on the developmental changes that the infants were experiencing. Most of the studies were longitudinal, but many did not use statistics appropriate for identifying stability and change over time. The response of individual infants and the broader ecological context as evidenced by factors such as gender, ethnic group, culture, and intergenerational effects were rarely examined. Thus research on the care of preterm infants could be expanded if the developmental science perspective formed the basis of more studies.
Similar articles
-
Parents of children with chronic health problems: programs of nursing research and their relationship to developmental science.Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2003;21:247-77. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2003. PMID: 12858699 Review.
-
Symptom experiences of children and adolescents with cancer.Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2003;21:123-49. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2003. PMID: 12858695 Review.
-
Enhancing nursing research with children and families using a developmental science perspective.Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2003;21:1-20. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2003. PMID: 12858691 Review.
-
Early dyadic patterns of mother-infant interactions and outcomes of prematurity at 18 months.Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e107-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1145. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 16818525
-
Comparing nursing costs for preterm infants receiving conventional vs. developmental care.Nurs Econ. 1997 May-Jun;15(3):138-45, 150. Nurs Econ. 1997. PMID: 9305114
Cited by
-
Potential Pitfalls in Collecting and Analyzing Longitudinal Data from Chronically Ill Populations.Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2010 Mar 1;10(1):10-18. doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2009.12.003. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2010. PMID: 20190867 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of perinatal morbidity and environmental factors on health status of preterm children at age 12.J Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;24(2):101-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2008.02.031. Epub 2008 Sep 4. J Pediatr Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19268232 Free PMC article.