Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing
- PMID: 12860340
- DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00012-5
Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing
Abstract
Objectives: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is an established method for termination of pregnancy. However, there is no general agreement about how best to evaluate the treatment outcome.
Study design: In 217 women with an unwanted pregnancy below 49 days of amenorrhoea, ultrasound examination and serum hCG test were performed before treatment and at follow-up.
Results: Treatment was successful in 98.2%. At follow-up their hCG dropped to a mean of 3% (S.D. 3) of initial levels and the endometrium measured a mean of 10 mm (S.D. 4). Interpretation of endometrium was difficult in some cases because of inhomogeneous structure. Using hCG was reliable in 98.5% of successful abortions. For ultrasound the corresponding figure was 89.8% for the cases with a confirmed intrauterine pregnancy before treatment but only 66% if all pregnancies were included.
Conclusion: Measuring serum hCG before treatment and at follow-up is more effective than ultrasound to confirm a successful medically induced abortion in early pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Feasibility and effectiveness of unintended pregnancy prevention with low-dose mifepristone combined with misoprostol before expected menstruation.Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec;30(12):2794-801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev239. Epub 2015 Sep 23. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 26405260
-
Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):462-6. doi: 10.1080/00016340701203632. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007. PMID: 17486469
-
Medical abortion in the first trimester: the use of serum hCG and endometrial thickness as markers of completeness.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Dec;12(4):366-71. doi: 10.1080/13625180701536300. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007. PMID: 17853164
-
Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):551-563.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1244. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31715147
-
Medical methods for first-trimester abortion.Am Fam Physician. 2004 Jul 1;70(1):81-3. Am Fam Physician. 2004. PMID: 15259521 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Acceptability of Home-Assessment Post Medical Abortion and Medical Abortion in a Low-Resource Setting in Rajasthan, India. Secondary Outcome Analysis of a Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0133354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133354. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26327217 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
High level of beta-hCG simulating pregnancy in recurrent osteosarcoma: case report and review of literature.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun;130(6):357-61. doi: 10.1007/s00432-004-0541-3. Epub 2004 Mar 24. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15042358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Misoprostol Abortion: Ultrasonography versus Beta-hCG Testing for Verification of Effectiveness.Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;29(6):1367-70. doi: 10.12669/pjms.296.3361. Pak J Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 24550955 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing telemedicine to in-clinic medication abortions induced with mifepristone and misoprostol.Contracept X. 2020 Apr 11;2:100023. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100023. eCollection 2020. Contracept X. 2020. PMID: 32550538 Free PMC article.
-
Medication to Manage Abortion and Miscarriage.J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):2398-2405. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05836-9. Epub 2020 May 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32410127 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical