Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture
- PMID: 12860765
- DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.801
Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture
Abstract
Hypothesis: The incidence of silicone breast implant rupture varies with implantation time and type of implant.
Objective: To measure the incidence of implant rupture by repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among women with silicone breast implants.
Design, setting, and participants: In 1999, 271 women who had received breast implants at least 3 years before, and who were randomly chosen from a larger cohort of women with cosmetic breast implants, underwent a baseline MRI. A second MRI was performed in 2001; 317 silicone implants (in 186 women) that were intact at the baseline MRI (n = 280) or were intact at baseline but removed before the second MRI (n = 37) were included in the rupture incidence analyses.
Main outcome measures: Implants were diagnosed with definite or possible rupture. Crude and implant age-adjusted incidence rates were calculated, and implant survival was estimated based on the observed rupture rates.
Results: We found 33 definite ruptures (10%) and 23 possible ruptures (7%) during the 2-year period. The overall rupture incidence rate for definite ruptures was 5.3 ruptures/100 implants per year (95% confidence interval, 4.0-7.0). The rupture rate increased significantly with increasing implant age. Double-lumen implants were associated with substantially lower rupture risk than single-lumen implants. For modern implants intact 3 years after implantation, we estimated rupture-free survival of 98% at 5 years and 83% to 85% at 10 years.
Conclusions: The risk of implant rupture increases with implant age. A minimum of 15% of modern implants can be expected to rupture between the third and tenth year after implantation.
Similar articles
-
Silicone gel breast implant rupture, extracapsular silicone, and health status in a population of women.J Rheumatol. 2001 May;28(5):996-1003. J Rheumatol. 2001. PMID: 11361228
-
The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation.Eur J Radiol. 2005 Feb;53(2):213-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.012. Eur J Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15664285
-
Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Oct;175(4):1057-64. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1751057. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000. PMID: 11000165
-
The safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants: a review of the epidemiologic evidence.Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Nov;59(5):569-80. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318066f0bd. Ann Plast Surg. 2007. PMID: 17992155 Review.
-
Imaging of the patient with silicone gel breast implants.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001 May;9(2):393-408, vii-viii. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001. PMID: 11493428 Review.
Cited by
-
Failure of an Ancient Breast Implant Can Lead to Significant Morbidity.Cureus. 2021 Mar 4;13(3):e13700. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13700. Cureus. 2021. Retraction in: Cureus. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):r30. doi: 10.7759/cureus.r30. PMID: 33833920 Retracted.
-
Chest Wall Silicone Granuloma Following Ruptured Silicone Breast Implant Causes Giant Chest Wall Abscess and Osteomyelitis: The First Report.Eur J Breast Health. 2021 Oct 4;17(4):383-385. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2020.5971. eCollection 2021 Oct. Eur J Breast Health. 2021. PMID: 34651119 Free PMC article.
-
Breast reconstruction of an unusual configuration using two paranemic implants.Gland Surg. 2017 Dec;6(6):729-732. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.07.03. Gland Surg. 2017. PMID: 29302492 Free PMC article.
-
How to prevent complications in breast augmentation.Gland Surg. 2017 Apr;6(2):210-217. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.04.02. Gland Surg. 2017. PMID: 28497025 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Imaging of breast implants-a pictorial review.Insights Imaging. 2011 Dec;2(6):653-670. doi: 10.1007/s13244-011-0122-3. Epub 2011 Aug 7. Insights Imaging. 2011. PMID: 22347984 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical