Cost analysis in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis

Abstract

Background: The present treatment regimen for a diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis involves a prolonged course of antibiotic therapy along with other adjunctive therapy. The decision to start treatment is made after diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis, which is based on subjective symptoms. The working hypothesis of this study is that the diagnosis based on subjective symptoms is inaccurate, leading to inappropriate antibiotic therapy and unnecessary health care expense.

Methods: One hundred patients were evaluated prospectively to determine which patients qualified for this study. Seventy-eight patients satisfied current criteria for a diagnosis of rhinosinusitis.

Results: Fifty-three percent (41 patients) of the 78 patients did not have a diagnosis of chronic sinusitis based on same-day computed tomography (CT) scanning. A charge analysis comparing treatment after diagnosis with medical therapy alone and CT scan for failures versus CT scanning with medical treatment for positive scans was performed. Although the most economical method of treatment was initiating medical therapy, it was also the least sensitive and specific in that 52% of patients didn't require the treatment. Endoscopy and/or CT screening with medical therapy were much better at appropriate diagnosis and targeted therapy but charge analysis indicated a much higher cost.

Conclusion: Presently, the current subjective diagnostic paradigm for chronic rhinosinusitis is most cost-effective but least accurate. Objective evaluations (endoscopy and CT scanning) to aid in diagnosis are more accurate but more costly. Where cost constraints are important, careful considerations of alternatives are important.