Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers
- PMID: 1286422
- DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-780-1124
Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers
Abstract
We have investigated whether the Lunar DPX (software 3.4) and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers have comparable normal reference databases for the spine and femur of white UK and USA subjects. After conversion for systematic differences in absolute bone density values between the two systems, the reference databases were very similar for the spine in young subjects, but there were clear differences in the femur databases of young females and males of all ages. These differences were confirmed by comparing the percent age-matched and young values determined by the two systems for subjects scanned on both systems. Thus the diagnosis and management of a patient could differ, depending on the system used for the bone density measurements.
Similar articles
-
Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers.Br J Radiol. 1991 Nov;64(767):1023-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-64-767-1023. Br J Radiol. 1991. PMID: 1742583 Clinical Trial.
-
Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Oct;9(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650091002. J Bone Miner Res. 1994. PMID: 7817795 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Sep;7(9):1081-4. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070911. J Bone Miner Res. 1992. PMID: 1414500
-
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA).Bone. 1996 Oct;19(4):415-7. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(96)90722-x. Bone. 1996. PMID: 8894149 Review. No abstract available.
-
Bone densitometry of the axial skeleton.Orthop Clin North Am. 1990 Jan;21(1):51-63. Orthop Clin North Am. 1990. PMID: 2404237 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient assessment using standardized bone mineral density values and a national reference database: implementing uniform thresholds for the reimbursement of osteoporosis treatments in Belgium.Osteoporos Int. 2003 Apr;14(2):110-5. doi: 10.1007/s00198-002-1321-z. Epub 2003 Jan 17. Osteoporos Int. 2003. PMID: 12730782
-
Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.Osteoporos Int. 2005 Jan;16(1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1639-9. Epub 2004 May 27. Osteoporos Int. 2005. PMID: 15167986
-
Longitudinal study of bone mineral density in patients with Crohn's disease.Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Jul;48(7):1355-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1024171529000. Dig Dis Sci. 2003. PMID: 12870795
-
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine in German men and women: a cross-sectional study.Calcif Tissue Int. 1995 May;56(5):350-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00301600. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995. PMID: 7621339
-
Influential role of lean soft tissue in the association between training volume and bone mineral density among male adolescent practitioners of impact-loading sports: ABCD Growth study.BMC Pediatr. 2020 Oct 28;20(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02402-4. BMC Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 33115423 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical