Double vision: reply to Freese and Powell
- PMID: 12866386
Double vision: reply to Freese and Powell
Abstract
Freese and Powell make a number of critiques of the theoretical assumptions, statistical methods, and use of variables in our paper, which raises questions about the typical use of the equal environments assumption in twin research. We do not find that any of their critiques modify our conclusion that the equal environments assumption cannot be taken for granted but must be subjected to empirical testing. We hope that our paper and the resulting exchange will lead sociologists to become more actively involved in the debate regarding the extent of genetic and environmental influences on social behaviors.
Comment on
-
Tilting at Twindmills: rethinking sociological responses to behavioral genetics.J Health Soc Behav. 2003 Jun;44(2):130-5. J Health Soc Behav. 2003. PMID: 12866385