Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Dec;42(12):1559-63.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg435. Epub 2003 Jul 16.

Seventeen-point dermal ultrasound scoring system--a reliable measure of skin thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis

Affiliations

Seventeen-point dermal ultrasound scoring system--a reliable measure of skin thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis

T L Moore et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to develop a 17-site ultrasound method of measuring skin thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to assess its inter- and intra-observer variability.

Methods: Dermal thickness (using a 22 MHz ultrasound probe) was measured at 17 sites (corresponding to those assessed in the modified Rodnan skin score) in 39 patients with SSc (26 limited cutaneous, 13 diffuse) and 34 healthy controls. The sum of the thicknesses (at the 17 sites) and the maximal thickness were also documented. Because skin thickness varies between sites, each measurement was converted to a z-score. Inter- and intra-observer variability were assessed in 35 patients/33 controls, and 20 patients/15 controls respectively.

Results: Measurement precision was good for the dermal measurements-intraclass correlation coefficients at the 17 sites ranged from 0.65 to 0.94 for the inter-observer variability (0.86 for maximum thickness) and from 0.55 to 0.96 for the intra-observer variability (0.92 for maximum thickness).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the 17-point dermal ultrasound scoring system is extremely reliable and may therefore be a useful measure of outcome, including in clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types