Brain banking for neurodegenerative diseases

Abstract

Purpose of review: Brain banking remains a necessity for the study of neurodegenerative diseases. While the characterization of pathology observed at autopsy confirms clinical diagnosis, the structure and contents of pathological hallmarks are the starting point from which disease pathogenesis may be elucidated. Traditional neuropathology has served to define, characterize, and diagnose neurodegenerative diseases, accompanied by clinical presentation. The pathological substrates are then studied for their role in how they cause dysfunction in disease, or how their accumulation is presumably damaging.

Recent findings: New genetic findings have revolutionized these studies and have prompted a reexamination of traditional pathological definitions of disease. Many familial genetic mutations have been found, encoding proteins such as synuclein, parkin, tau, and others, creating genetic ways to define neurodegenerative diseases. Many of these proteins are components of aggregates, thus the ability to label these proteins has revealed new pathological characteristics that must be standardized. More complicating is that many proteins genetically linked to clinically distinct diseases are involved in overlapping neuropathology of what now appears to be a spectrum of diseases: 'synucleinopathies', 'tauopathies', and so on. Moreover, as genetic discoveries fuel molecular experiments on brain tissue, banking methods must now accommodate these techniques. Lastly, DNA screening involves ethical issues beyond those which were previously considered with postmortem tissue banking.

Summary: As more proteins are linked to disease, more is revealed about the underlying causative mechanisms, exposing points for interventions. To achieve this end, characterization for neurodegenerative disease in the post genomic era must include genotype, phenotype and clinical characterization, and postmortem brain banking data which includes these.