Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Aug;97(2):436-441.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068980.40257.4C.

The effects of isoflurane on conditioned inhibition by dorsal column stimulation

Toshiyuki Tobita  1 , Manabu Okamoto, Miyako Shimizu, Tomohiro Yamakura, Hideyoshi Fujihara, Koki Shimoji, Hiroshi Baba
Affiliations

The effects of isoflurane on conditioned inhibition by dorsal column stimulation

Toshiyuki Tobita et al. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug.

Abstract

Spinal dorsal column stimulation (DCS) modulates sensory transmission, including pain, at the dorsal horn of the cord. However, the mechanisms of DCS modulatory actions and the effects of anesthetics on these mechanisms remain to be investigated. We studied the effects of isoflurane (1.0% and 2.0%) on conditioned inhibition, the amplitude decrease of the spinal cord potentials (SCPs) after a conditioning volley (DCS), in the ketamine-anesthetized rat by recording the sharp negative (N) and slow positive (P) waves of the SCPs evoked by conditioning dorsal column (DC) and testing segmental stimulations. The N wave is believed to be the synchronized activity of the dorsal horn neurons, and the P wave, primary afferent depolarization (PAD), reflecting presynaptic inhibition. The P potentials evoked by either DC or segmental stimulation were depressed by isoflurane, whereas the N waves remained unchanged, indicating that the pharmacological characteristics of these N and P waves are similar between DC-evoked and segmentally evoked SCPs. The conditioned inhibition of segmental N and P waves by DC stimulation was almost completely suppressed by 2.0% isoflurane. The conditioned inhibition of the segmental N wave was not changed by spinal cord transection, whereas the conditioned inhibition of the segmental P wave was decreased. The results indicate that isoflurane depresses presynaptic inhibition without affecting the synchronized activity of dorsal horn neurons and, most profoundly, depresses the conditioned inhibition by DC stimulation of the dorsal horn neurons and PAD. Further, the results indicate that conditioned inhibition by DC stimulation of PAD receives a facilitatory influence from the supraspinal structures, whereas that of the synchronized activity of the dorsal horn neurons does not.

Implications: To investigate how anesthetics affect supraspinal modulation of sensory transmission in the spinal cord, the spinal cord potential (SCP) evoked by dorsal cord stimulation (DCS) and segmentally evoked SCP conditioned by DCS were recorded in intact and spinal cord-transected rats during isoflurane anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Hagfors NR. Dorsal column electroanalgesia. J Neurosurg 1970; 32: 560–4.
    1. Shimoji K, Higashi H, Kano T, et al. Electrical management of intractable pain. Masui 1971; 20: 444–7.
    1. Nashold BS, Friedmann H. Dorsal column stimulation for control of pain. J Neurosurg 1972; 36: 590–7.
    1. Shimoji K, Kitamura H, Ikezono E, et al. Spinal hypalgesia and analgesia by low-frequency electrical stimulation in the epidural space. Anesthesiology 1974; 41: 91–4.
    1. Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Shimizu H, et al. Low-frequency, weak extradural stimulation in the management of intractable pain. Br J Anaesth 1977; 49: 1081–8.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources