Neck kinematics in rear-end impacts
- PMID: 12879138
- DOI: 10.1155/2003/839740
Neck kinematics in rear-end impacts
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to document the kinematics of the neck during low-speed rear-end impacts. In a series of experiments reported by Deng et al (2000), a pneumatically driven mini-sled was used to study cervical spine motion using six cadavers instrumented with metallic markers at each cervical level, a 9-accelerometer mount on the head, and a tri-axial accelerometers on the thorax. A 250-Hz x-ray system was used to record marker motion while acceleration data were digitized at 10,000 Hz. Results show that, in the global coordinate system, the head and all cervical vertebrae were primarily in extension during the entire period of x-ray data collection. In local coordinate systems, upper cervical segments were initially in relative flexion while lower segments were in extension. Facet joint capsular stretch ranged from 17 to 97%. In the vertical direction, the head and T1 accelerated upward almost instantaneously after impact initiation while there was delay for the head in the horizontal direction. This combination was the result of a force vector which was pointed in the forward and upward direction to generate an extension moment. Upward ramping of the torso was larger in tests with a 20-deg seatback angle. The study concluded that the kinematics of the neck is rather complicated and greatly influenced by the large rotations of the thoracic spine. Significant posterior shear deformation was found, as evidenced by the large facet capsular stretch. Although the neck forms a "mild" S-shaped curve during whiplash, using its shape as an injury mechanism can be misleading because the source of pain is likely to be located in the facet capsules.
Similar articles
-
Kinematics of human cadaver cervical spine during low speed rear-end impacts.Stapp Car Crash J. 2000 Nov;44:171-88. doi: 10.4271/2000-01-SC13. Stapp Car Crash J. 2000. PMID: 17458726
-
The relationship between lower neck shear force and facet joint kinematics during automotive rear impacts.Clin Anat. 2011 Apr;24(3):319-26. doi: 10.1002/ca.21172. Clin Anat. 2011. PMID: 21433081
-
Internal loads in the cervical spine during motor vehicle rear-end impacts: the effect of acceleration and head-to-head restraint proximity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):34-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00010. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. PMID: 11805633
-
Biomechanics of whiplash injury.Chin J Traumatol. 2009 Oct;12(5):305-14. Chin J Traumatol. 2009. PMID: 19788851 Review.
-
Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 3: minor injuries.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001 May;16(4):267-75. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00003-1. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001. PMID: 11358613 Review.
Cited by
-
The Effect of Seat Back Inclination on Spinal Alignment in Automotive Seating Postures.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Aug 2;9:684043. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.684043. eCollection 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 34409020 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge and application of correct car seat head restraint usage among chiropractic college interns: a cross-sectional study.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Mar;49(1):32-9. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005. PMID: 17549149 Free PMC article.
-
Neuronal hyperexcitability in the dorsal horn after painful facet joint injury.Pain. 2010 Nov;151(2):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.034. Epub 2010 Aug 23. Pain. 2010. PMID: 20739124 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical