Hysteresis in corticospinal excitability during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation in humans
- PMID: 12879181
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1518-1
Hysteresis in corticospinal excitability during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation in humans
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated that the firing behavior of single motor units varies in a nonlinear manner to the exerted torque during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation. However, it is unclear whether corticospinal excitability has such a hysteresis-like feature. In this study, we examined corticospinal excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during gradual muscle contraction and relaxation for torque regulation in elbow flexor muscles. Eight healthy male subjects performed two different isometric elbow flexion tasks, namely, sinusoidal and tonic torque exertion tasks. In the sinusoidal task, the subjects sinusoidally increased and decreased the isometric elbow flexion torque (range of 0-15% of maximum voluntary contraction) at three different frequencies (0.33, 0.17, and 0.08 Hz). For each ascending (contraction: CON) and descending (relaxation: REL) period of the exerted torque, a single TMS was applied at 5 phases. In the tonic task, the elbow flexion torque was tonically exerted at 7 levels in a similar range as that in the sinusoidal task. EMG activities were recorded from the agonists, the biceps brachii (BB) and brachioradialis (BRD) muscles, and an antagonist, the triceps brachii (TB) muscle. The results demonstrated that the EMG activities of both the agonists and antagonist were larger in the CON period than the REL period, even when the exerted torque was the same. However, there were no significant differences in EMG activation profiles among the different frequencies of contraction. In BB and BRD, the motor-evoked potential (MEP) elicited by the TMS was also greater in the CON period than in the REL period. This CON-REL difference of MEP amplitudes was still observed when corrections were made for the increased EMG activities; that is, the MEP amplitudes to the identical EMG activities were greater in the CON period than in the REL period, and this phenomenon was more pronounced at higher frequencies. In addition, the degree to which sinusoidal MEPs exceeded tonic MEPs in the CON period and were smaller than tonic MEPs in the REL period became more pronounced at higher frequencies. On the other hand, there were significant correlations between the BB and BRD MEP amplitudes and the rate of change of elbow flexion/extension torque. These results indicate that corticospinal excitability during muscle contraction and relaxation has a neural hysteresis to the muscle activity, i.e., spinal motoneuronal activity, according to the rate of change of the exerted torque, i.e., muscle tension. This suggests that corticospinal excitability modulation depends not only on concurrent spinal motoneuronal activity and muscle tension but also on the time-series pattern of their changes during muscle contraction and relaxation.
Similar articles
-
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.Neuroscience. 2016 May 13;322:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.025. Epub 2016 Feb 15. Neuroscience. 2016. PMID: 26892298
-
Elbow angle modulates corticospinal excitability to the resting biceps brachii at both spinal and supraspinal levels.Exp Physiol. 2019 Apr;104(4):546-555. doi: 10.1113/EP087472. Epub 2019 Feb 21. Exp Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30690803
-
Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is higher during arm cycling than an intensity-matched tonic contraction.J Neurophysiol. 2014 Sep 1;112(5):1142-51. doi: 10.1152/jn.00210.2014. Epub 2014 Jun 3. J Neurophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24899677
-
Investigating human motor control by transcranial magnetic stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1537-y. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Exp Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12879177 Review.
-
Measurement of voluntary activation based on transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Sep 1;121(3):678-86. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00293.2016. Epub 2016 Jul 14. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016. PMID: 27418687 Review.
Cited by
-
Mandibular physiological tremor is reduced by increasing-force ramp contractions and periodontal anaesthesia.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jan;184(1):71-82. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1083-0. Epub 2007 Aug 8. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 17684734
-
Contraction Phase and Force Differentially Change Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Slope and Interhemispheric Inhibition in Young Versus Old.Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 6;14:581008. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.581008. eCollection 2020. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33132888 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of increasing and decreasing isometric finger force generation and the possible role of the corticospinal system in this process.Motor Control. 2013 Jul;17(3):221-37. doi: 10.1123/mcj.17.3.221. Epub 2013 Jan 31. Motor Control. 2013. PMID: 23370725 Free PMC article.
-
The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.J Neurol. 2007 Aug;254(8):1089-98. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0493-4. Epub 2007 Apr 13. J Neurol. 2007. PMID: 17431701
-
Cortical and subcortical mechanisms for precisely controlled force generation and force relaxation.Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2640-50. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp015. Epub 2009 Mar 2. Cereb Cortex. 2009. PMID: 19254959 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources