Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):198.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.198.

Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent

Elizabeth Rees et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a process of advance consent to enable research to be undertaken in patients in the terminal phase.

Design: Feasibility study of an advance consent process to support a randomised controlled trial of two antimuscarinic drugs (hyoscine hydrobromide and glycopyrronium bromide) in the management of noisy respirations associated with retained secretions ("death rattle").

Setting: Palliative care wards in a major cancer centre.

Participants: Patients admitted to a palliative care ward who may develop "death rattle" and thus be eligible for randomisation.

Main outcome measures: Patient accrual; acceptability of the consent process.

Results: Of the 107 patients approached, 58 patients gave advance consent to participate in the study. Of these, 15 patients developed death rattle and were randomised to receive either hyoscine or glycopyrronium; 16 patients died elsewhere; 15 patients died on the palliative care wards but were not randomised; 12 patients are still alive.

Conclusions: Initial assessment suggests that this is a workable consent process allowing research to be undertaken in patients who are unable to give consent at the time of randomisation. Patient accrual rates to date are lower than needed to recruit adequate numbers in the time allotted to answer the research question.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow in the study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Health. www.doh.gov.uk/consent (accessed Nov 2002).
    1. Biros MH, Lewis RJ, Olson CM, Runge JW, Cummins RO, Fost N. Informed consent in emergency research. JAMA 1995;273: 1283-7. - PubMed
    1. Warren JW, Sobal J, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, Damron D, Levenson S, et al. Informed consent by proxy. N Engl J Med 1986;315: 1124-8. - PubMed
    1. Hardy J. Consent for trials in palliative care. Lancet Perspectives 2000;356: s44. - PubMed
    1. Assessment of mental capacity: guidance for doctors and lawyers: a report of the British Medical Association and the Law Society. London: BMA, 1995.

Publication types