Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects
- PMID: 12885110
- DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.422
Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects
Abstract
The goal of avoiding distraction (e.g., ignoring words when naming their print colors in a Stroop task) is opposed intrinsically by the penchant to process conspicuous and correlated characteristics of the environment (e.g., noticing trial-to-trial associations between the colors and the words). To reconcile these opposing forces, the authors propose a tectonic theory of selective attention in which 2 memory-based structures--dimensional imbalance and dimensional uncertainty--drive selection by processing salient, surprising, and/or correlated information contained within and across stimulus dimensions. Each structure modulates the buildup of excitation to targets and the buildup of inhibition to distractors and to memories of previous stimuli. Tectonic theory is implemented to simulate the impact of 4 types of context on the presence, magnitude, and direction of congruity effects and task effects in the Stroop paradigm. The tectonic model is shown to surpass other formal models in explaining the range and diversity of Sroop effects.
Similar articles
-
A confluence of contexts: asymmetric versus global failures of selective attention to stroop dimensions.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Jun;27(3):515-37. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.515. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001. PMID: 11424642
-
Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 14;12(10):12803-33. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121012803. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26473909 Free PMC article.
-
Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm.Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00776.x. Psychol Sci. 2005. PMID: 15660848
-
Task switching: a PDP model.Cogn Psychol. 2002 May;44(3):297-337. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0770. Cogn Psychol. 2002. PMID: 11971634 Review.
-
Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005. PMID: 15668100 Review.
Cited by
-
The visual-auditory color-word stroop asymmetry and its time course.Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1325-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03193365. Mem Cognit. 2005. PMID: 16615380
-
Disentangling semantic and response learning effects in color-word contingency learning.PLoS One. 2019 May 6;14(5):e0212714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212714. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31059506 Free PMC article.
-
Age-related changes in attentional selection: revealing processes underlying the degradation of task set quality.Psychol Res. 2025 Feb 27;89(2):57. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02087-3. Psychol Res. 2025. PMID: 40014157
-
The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Mar;43(3):369-384. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000311. Epub 2016 Sep 22. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017. PMID: 27656873 Free PMC article.
-
Contextual influences on the sequential congruency effect.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):155-62. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0473-5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 23821460
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources